Identification strategies for model-based control

Identification strategies for model-based control A reduced-order modelling (ROM) strategy is crucial to achieve model-based control in a wide class of flow configurations. In turbulence, ROMs are mostly derived by Galerkin projection of first-principles equations onto the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modes. These POD ROMs are known to be relatively fragile when used for control design. To understand more deeply this behaviour, a hierarchy of POD ROMs is studied and compared for a two-dimensional uncontrolled mixing layer. First, dynamical models based on POD are derived from the Navier–Stokes and the vorticity equations. It is shown that these models can exhibit for some truncation level finite-time blow-ups. A symmetrized quadratic model is then proposed to enforce the preservation of energy in the model. This formulation improves considerably the behaviour of the model, but the energy level is still overestimated. Subsequently, a nonlinear eddy-viscosity model with guaranteed stability is proposed. This model still leads to an imperfect description of the energy. Different 4D-Var identification strategies are then considered to improve the nonlinear eddy-viscosity model. It is shown that penalizing the time variation in the eddy-viscosity parameter leads to the best compromise in terms of description of the energy and of physical relevance of the eddy viscosity. Lastly, a statistical inference procedure is used to take into account the bias inherent of the sampling employed in the identification procedure. Joined probability density functions are then determined empirically for all the coefficients of the model, and a stochastic dynamical model is finally derived to study the influence on the long-term solution of different equiprobable sets of coefficients. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Experiments in Fluids Springer Journals
Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/identification-strategies-for-model-based-control-UT991G9GXH
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Engineering; Engineering Fluid Dynamics; Fluid- and Aerodynamics; Engineering Thermodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer
ISSN
0723-4864
eISSN
1432-1114
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00348-013-1580-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A reduced-order modelling (ROM) strategy is crucial to achieve model-based control in a wide class of flow configurations. In turbulence, ROMs are mostly derived by Galerkin projection of first-principles equations onto the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modes. These POD ROMs are known to be relatively fragile when used for control design. To understand more deeply this behaviour, a hierarchy of POD ROMs is studied and compared for a two-dimensional uncontrolled mixing layer. First, dynamical models based on POD are derived from the Navier–Stokes and the vorticity equations. It is shown that these models can exhibit for some truncation level finite-time blow-ups. A symmetrized quadratic model is then proposed to enforce the preservation of energy in the model. This formulation improves considerably the behaviour of the model, but the energy level is still overestimated. Subsequently, a nonlinear eddy-viscosity model with guaranteed stability is proposed. This model still leads to an imperfect description of the energy. Different 4D-Var identification strategies are then considered to improve the nonlinear eddy-viscosity model. It is shown that penalizing the time variation in the eddy-viscosity parameter leads to the best compromise in terms of description of the energy and of physical relevance of the eddy viscosity. Lastly, a statistical inference procedure is used to take into account the bias inherent of the sampling employed in the identification procedure. Joined probability density functions are then determined empirically for all the coefficients of the model, and a stochastic dynamical model is finally derived to study the influence on the long-term solution of different equiprobable sets of coefficients.

Journal

Experiments in FluidsSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 26, 2013

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off