Human Rights, Global Justice, or Historical Responsibility? Three Potential Appeals

Human Rights, Global Justice, or Historical Responsibility? Three Potential Appeals J Value Inquiry (2017) 51:397–415 DOI 10.1007/s10790-016-9585-2 Human Rights, Global Justice, or Historical Responsibility? Three Potential Appeals 1,2 Steve Vanderheiden Published online: 22 December 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Reform-minded theorists of global justice sometimes invoke a pragmatic form of ethical pluralism on behalf of constructing normative convergence around practical proposals to identify and redress existing injustice. Thomas Pogge, for example, offers three different but plausible ‘‘grounds of injustice’’ to impugn the ‘‘radical inequality’’ of global poverty, claiming that all three ‘‘agree on the same feasible reform of the status quo as a major step toward justice.’’ So long as three ‘‘distinct and competing political philosophies’’ can all classify some phenomenon as unjust and endorse the same reform proposal as promoting justice, he claims, we need not ‘‘decide among them’’ as offering either the most defensible diagnosis of the origin and nature of the injustice or the correspondingly appropriate remedial objectives. Even if the differences among those three approaches are of theoretical interest, appealing to distinct normative theories, such differences should not obstruct consensus around practical measures to lessen (if not fully rectify) the injustice in question. In certain practical contexts, this effort at consensus-building could be commended http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Value Inquiry Springer Journals

Human Rights, Global Justice, or Historical Responsibility? Three Potential Appeals

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/human-rights-global-justice-or-historical-responsibility-three-S9mUEfOWmJ
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Philosophy; Ontology; Ethics; International Political Economy; Public International Law; Philosophy, general
ISSN
0022-5363
eISSN
1573-0492
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10790-016-9585-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

J Value Inquiry (2017) 51:397–415 DOI 10.1007/s10790-016-9585-2 Human Rights, Global Justice, or Historical Responsibility? Three Potential Appeals 1,2 Steve Vanderheiden Published online: 22 December 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Reform-minded theorists of global justice sometimes invoke a pragmatic form of ethical pluralism on behalf of constructing normative convergence around practical proposals to identify and redress existing injustice. Thomas Pogge, for example, offers three different but plausible ‘‘grounds of injustice’’ to impugn the ‘‘radical inequality’’ of global poverty, claiming that all three ‘‘agree on the same feasible reform of the status quo as a major step toward justice.’’ So long as three ‘‘distinct and competing political philosophies’’ can all classify some phenomenon as unjust and endorse the same reform proposal as promoting justice, he claims, we need not ‘‘decide among them’’ as offering either the most defensible diagnosis of the origin and nature of the injustice or the correspondingly appropriate remedial objectives. Even if the differences among those three approaches are of theoretical interest, appealing to distinct normative theories, such differences should not obstruct consensus around practical measures to lessen (if not fully rectify) the injustice in question. In certain practical contexts, this effort at consensus-building could be commended

Journal

The Journal of Value InquirySpringer Journals

Published: Dec 22, 2016

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off