How reliable is the posterior interosseous flap? A review of 88 patients

How reliable is the posterior interosseous flap? A review of 88 patients The distally-based, reverse posterior interosseous flap can be used to reconstruct soft tissue defects in the region of the hand, provided there is an intact anastomotic network of the posterior and anterior interosseous system at the wrist. Between 1986 and 2000, 88 flap procedures were planned. Anatomical variations were recorded in 21 patients (24%) and precluded the use of the flap in five patients. In the remaining 16 patients, flap dissection was more difficult due to anatomical variations. There was a complication rate of 23%, including haematoma, congestion, infection or technical errors, which resulted in flap necrosis of variable degrees in 11 patients (13%). In case of haematoma, flap loss could be reduced by early revision surgery. There was no statistical correlation between anatomical variations and complications or flap loss. Secondary flap corrections, including defatting and remodelling, were commonly performed in due course. Knowing the limitations of the posterior interosseous flap, fasciocutaneous flaps are considered ideal to reconstruct soft tissue defects or contractures of the thumb web and the dorsal hand because of good tissue matching. Fascial flaps are a good option for palmar defects or to wrap neurolized nerves. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

How reliable is the posterior interosseous flap? A review of 88 patients

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/how-reliable-is-the-posterior-interosseous-flap-a-review-of-88-E5CLTKfIgt
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-001-0311-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The distally-based, reverse posterior interosseous flap can be used to reconstruct soft tissue defects in the region of the hand, provided there is an intact anastomotic network of the posterior and anterior interosseous system at the wrist. Between 1986 and 2000, 88 flap procedures were planned. Anatomical variations were recorded in 21 patients (24%) and precluded the use of the flap in five patients. In the remaining 16 patients, flap dissection was more difficult due to anatomical variations. There was a complication rate of 23%, including haematoma, congestion, infection or technical errors, which resulted in flap necrosis of variable degrees in 11 patients (13%). In case of haematoma, flap loss could be reduced by early revision surgery. There was no statistical correlation between anatomical variations and complications or flap loss. Secondary flap corrections, including defatting and remodelling, were commonly performed in due course. Knowing the limitations of the posterior interosseous flap, fasciocutaneous flaps are considered ideal to reconstruct soft tissue defects or contractures of the thumb web and the dorsal hand because of good tissue matching. Fascial flaps are a good option for palmar defects or to wrap neurolized nerves.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jan 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off