Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Kelley, L. Peters, G. O'Connor (2009)
Intra-organizational networking for innovation-based corporate entrepreneurshipJournal of Business Venturing, 24
RN Cardozo, R Engleman (2004)
Frontiers of entrepreneurship research
(2001)
The geographic reach of market and non-market channels of technology transfer: Comparing citations and licenses of university patents
J. Lerner (1994)
The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical AnalysisThe RAND Journal of Economics, 25
EF Fama, KR French (2005)
Financing decisions: Who issues stock?Journal of Financial Economics, 76
Bettina Peters (2008)
Innovation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation for German Firms
P. Rosenbaum, D. Rubin (1984)
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 79
P. Aydalot (1988)
High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience
(1997)
Spin-off enterprises
J. Mairesse, Bronwyn Hall, Benoît Mulkay (1998)
Firm-Level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty YearsERN: Firm Behavior (Topic)
M. Best (2001)
The New Competitive Advantage: The Renewal of American Industry
Å. Dahlstrand (1997)
Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firmsResearch Policy, 26
P. Mustar, M. Wright, B. Clarysse (2008)
University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in EuropeScience and Public Policy, 35
F. Rothaermel, Shanti Agung, Lin Jiang (2007)
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literatureIndustrial and Corporate Change, 16
R. Quinn, K. Cameron (1983)
Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary EvidenceManagement Science, 29
G. George, S. Zahra, David Wood (2002)
The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companiesJournal of Business Venturing, 17
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
G. Fryxell (1990)
Multiple Outcomes from Product R&D: Profitability Under Different Strategic OrientationsJournal of Management, 16
Rajeev Dehejia, S. Wahba (2002)
Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal StudiesReview of Economics and Statistics, 84
P Mustar (1997)
Spin-off enterprises. How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success and failureScience and Public Policy, 24
T. Elfring, W. Hulsink (2003)
Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology FirmsSmall Business Economics, 21
S. Shane (2004)
Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation
(1991)
Local ‘milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: Toward a new dynamic theory of economic space
E. Fama, K. French (2004)
Financing Decisions: Who Issues Stock?S&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Toby Stuart, Ha Hoang, R. Hybels (1999)
Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial VenturesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
(2001)
Gererating spin-offs: Evidence from across the OECD
R. Helm, O. Mauroner (2007)
Success of research-based spin-offs. State-of-the-art and guidelines for further researchReview of Managerial Science, 1
M. Colombo, L. Grilli, E. Piva (2006)
In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-upsResearch Policy, 35
(1998)
Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises
R Campagni (1991)
Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives
N. Mantel, W. Haenszel (1959)
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22 4
(2002)
Observational studies (2nd ed.)
S. Klepper, S. Sleeper (2005)
Entry by SpinoffsManag. Sci., 51
A. Chandler, A. Saxenian (1994)
Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128The New England Quarterly, 68
(2004)
Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models
Elizabeth Bell (1993)
Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations: a reviewTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5
Jürgen Egeln, Sandra Gottschalk, C. Rammer (2004)
Location Decisions of Spin-offs from Public Research InstitutionsIndustry and Innovation, 11
(1989)
Groupe de recherche européen sur les milieux innovateurs
Anna Lejpras, Andreas Stephan (2008)
Locational conditions, cooperation, and innovativeness: evidence from research and company spin-offsThe Annals of Regional Science, 46
P. Rosenbaum, Donald Rubin (1983)
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 70
(2004)
University technology and new business opportunities
Bart Clarysse, N. Moray (2004)
A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-offJournal of Business Venturing, 19
(2001)
Spin-offs from public research: Trends and outlook
P. Geroski, J. Reenen, Chris Walters (1997)
HOW PERSISTENTLY DO FIRMS INNOVATEResearch Policy, 26
(2001)
OECD STI review
Sascha Becker, Marco Caliendo (2007)
Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment EffectsThe Stata Journal, 7
E. Cefis (2003)
Is there persistence in innovative activitiesInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 21
(2006)
Matching estimators of causal effects: Prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice
P. Mustar (1998)
Partnerships, Configurations and Dynamics in the Creation and Development of SMEs by ResearchersIndustry and Higher Education, 12
(2005)
Productivity and R&D. A nonparametric analysis
(1970)
The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
A. Walter, M. Auer, Thomas Ritter (2006)
The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performanceJournal of Business Venturing, 21
Robert Kazanjian, R. Drazin (1990)
A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new venturesJournal of Business Venturing, 5
J. Liebeskind, Amalya Oliver, L. Zucker, M. Brewer (1994)
Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology FirmsIRPN: Innovation Networks (Topic)
(2001)
OECD STI review (Vol
Marco Caliendo, Reinhard Hujer (2005)
The microeconometric estimation of treatment effects—An overviewAllgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90
M. Smith, A. Storey, D. Swanton (2003)
The Oxford handbook of economic geography.
Benoît Mulkay, Bronwyn Hall, J. Mairesse (2000)
Firm Level Investment and R&D in France and the United States: A ComparisonIRPN: Innovation Systems (Topic)
M. Dodgson (1992)
Technological collaboration: problems and pitfallsTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 4
D. Rubin (1978)
BIAS REDUCTION USING MAHALANOBIS METRIC MATCHINGPsychometrika, 1978
PR Rosenbaum (2002)
Observational studies
G. George, S. Zahra, K. Wheatley, Raihan Khan (2001)
The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance A study of biotechnology firmsThe Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12
(2004)
Entwicklungsverläufe forschungsnaher Unternehmensgründungen und deren Determinanten: Eine empirische Untersuchung auf Basis organisationsökologischer Konzepte
P. Cooke, Mikel Uranga, Goio Etxebarria (1997)
Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensionsResearch Policy, 26
(2000)
Locations, clusters and company strategy
G. Stigler (1969)
The Organization of Industry
A. Heirman, B. Clarysse (2004)
How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational PerspectiveThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 29
The literature argues that research spin-offs (RSOs)—enterprises originating from a university or research institute—appear to have higher innovative potential and capabilities than other start-ups, at least in the early stages of their development. Yet, little is known about the innovative performance of these companies at later development phases. Thus, the main goal of this study is to investigate whether there are any differences in research and development (R&D) and innovation behavior between established and/or mature RSOs and otherwise created firms and, if so, to what extent they are driven by networking and cooperation activities as suggested by some scholars. To this end, we employ probit regression analysis and a matching approach using survey data on more than 6,000 East German firms, among which are 179 RSOs. Our first findings suggest that established RSOs engage in R&D and innovation activities more frequently than companies whose genesis was of another type. Nevertheless, the results obtained when accounting for collaboration measures show that the precedence of RSOs in further development stages over otherwise created firms in terms of innovation outputs is related to their higher intensity of cooperation activity and close, face-to-face interactions with universities, and not to type of firm creation. Moreover, our findings reveal that cooperating in various fields may be of different importance for specific inputs and outputs of the innovation activity. Finally, based on our results, we draw some implications for both practicing managers and public policymakers.
Small Business Economics – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 10, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.