Heterogeneity and Certainty in Candidate Evaluations

Heterogeneity and Certainty in Candidate Evaluations Political Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 1, March 2005 ( 2005) DOI 10.1007/s11109-005-3074-9 HETEROGENEITY AND CERTAINTY IN CANDIDATE EVALUATIONS David A. M. Peterson While perceptions of candidate character traits are believed to be an important pre- dictor of vote choice, very little research attempts to explain where these perceptions come from. There is also a remarkable inconsistency in the literature about which voters use traits and which use issues in voting—with completely contradictory results common. The solution to the inconsistency developed here is to focus on the rela- tionship between issues and traits as opposed to just these attitudes’ direct effect on candidate evaluations. By positing that the relationship between issues and trait per- ceptions depends on the citizen’s certainty about the candidate’s issue positions the theory develop here answers questions about the nature of trait perceptions and the heterogeneity of voter decisionmaking. The theory is tested using evaluations of ten different presidential candidates from five National Election Studies. Key words: candidate evaluations; certainty; trait perceptions; voter heterogeneity. Voters evaluate candidates like they evaluate other people they encounter. We form impressions of candidates’ abilities, intelligence, integrity, and hon- esty, and we rate and evaluate the candidates in part based on http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Political Behavior Springer Journals

Heterogeneity and Certainty in Candidate Evaluations

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/heterogeneity-and-certainty-in-candidate-evaluations-rjsWlLv10r
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations; Political Science; Sociology, general
ISSN
0190-9320
eISSN
1573-6687
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11109-005-3074-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Political Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 1, March 2005 ( 2005) DOI 10.1007/s11109-005-3074-9 HETEROGENEITY AND CERTAINTY IN CANDIDATE EVALUATIONS David A. M. Peterson While perceptions of candidate character traits are believed to be an important pre- dictor of vote choice, very little research attempts to explain where these perceptions come from. There is also a remarkable inconsistency in the literature about which voters use traits and which use issues in voting—with completely contradictory results common. The solution to the inconsistency developed here is to focus on the rela- tionship between issues and traits as opposed to just these attitudes’ direct effect on candidate evaluations. By positing that the relationship between issues and trait per- ceptions depends on the citizen’s certainty about the candidate’s issue positions the theory develop here answers questions about the nature of trait perceptions and the heterogeneity of voter decisionmaking. The theory is tested using evaluations of ten different presidential candidates from five National Election Studies. Key words: candidate evaluations; certainty; trait perceptions; voter heterogeneity. Voters evaluate candidates like they evaluate other people they encounter. We form impressions of candidates’ abilities, intelligence, integrity, and hon- esty, and we rate and evaluate the candidates in part based on

Journal

Political BehaviorSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 28, 2005

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off