Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Charles Audet, J. Dennis (2006)
Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained OptimizationSIAM J. Optim., 17
Juliane Müller, R. Piché (2011)
Mixture surrogate models based on Dempster-Shafer theory for global optimization problemsJournal of Global Optimization, 51
Bryan Tolson, C. Shoemaker (2007)
Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibrationWater Resources Research, 43
Juliane Müller, C. Shoemaker, R. Piché (2014)
SO-I: a surrogate model algorithm for expensive nonlinear integer programming problems including global optimization applicationsJournal of Global Optimization, 59
F. Viana (2011)
Multiple surrogates for prediction and optimization
T. Goel, R. Haftka, W. Shyy, N. Queipo (2007)
Ensemble of surrogatesStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 33
Alexander Forrester, A. Sóbester, A. Keane (2008)
Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide
B. Talgorn, Sébastien Digabel, M. Kokkolaras (2015)
Statistical Surrogate Formulations for Simulation-Based Design OptimizationJournal of Mechanical Design, 137
D. Bertsekas (1982)
Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods
Juliane Müller (2016)
MISO: mixed-integer surrogate optimization frameworkOptimization and Engineering, 17
G. Liuzzi, S. Lucidi, F. Rinaldi (2015)
Derivative-Free Methods for Mixed-Integer Constrained Optimization ProblemsJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 164
Juliane Müller, C. Shoemaker, R. Piché (2013)
SO-MI: A surrogate model algorithm for computationally expensive nonlinear mixed-integer black-box global optimization problemsComput. Oper. Res., 40
(2009)
A progressive barrier approach for derivative-free nonlinear programming
Bradley Boehmke, Brandon Greenwell (2019)
Multivariate Adaptive Regression SplinesHands-On Machine Learning with R
Bryan Tolson, M. Asadzadeh, H. Maier, A. Zecchin (2009)
Hybrid discrete dynamically dimensioned search (HD‐DDS) algorithm for water distribution system design optimizationWater Resources Research, 45
R. Regis, C. Shoemaker (2007)
A Stochastic Radial Basis Function Method for the Global Optimization of Expensive FunctionsINFORMS J. Comput., 19
(2005)
Use of krigingmodels to approximate deterministic computermodels
J. Nocedal, Stephen Wright (2018)
Numerical Optimization
G. Matheron (1963)
Principles of geostatisticsEconomic Geology, 58
R. Regis, C. Shoemaker (2013)
Combining radial basis function surrogates and dynamic coordinate search in high-dimensional expensive black-box optimizationEngineering Optimization, 45
Jonathan Currie, David Wilson (2012)
Opti: Lowering the Barrier Between Open Source Optimizers and the Industrial MATLAB User
(1999)
MT3DMS: AModular Three-DimensionalMultispecies TransportModel
A Booker, J Dennis, P Frank, D Serafini, V Torczon, M Trosset (1999)
A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogatesStruct. Multidisc. Optim., 17
R. Regis, C. Shoemaker (2013)
A quasi-multistart framework for global optimization of expensive functions using response surface modelsJournal of Global Optimization, 56
James Parr (2013)
Improvement criteria for constraint handling and multiobjective optimization
Sébastien Digabel (2010)
Algorithm xxx : NOMAD : Nonlinear Optimization with the MADS algorithm
B. Tolson, C. Shoemaker (2007)
Cannonsville Reservoir Watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validationJournal of Hydrology, 337
J. Moré, Stefan Wild (2009)
Benchmarking Derivative-Free Optimization AlgorithmsSIAM J. Optim., 20
N. Draper (1997)
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed ExperimentsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 59
Stefan Wild, R. Regis, C. Shoemaker (2008)
ORBIT: Optimization by Radial Basis Function Interpolation in Trust-RegionsSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 30
J. Arnold, R. Srinivasan, R. Muttiah, John Williams (1998)
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34
R. Gramacy, G. Gray, Sébastien Digabel, Herbert Lee, P. Ranjan, Garth Wells, Stefan Wild (2014)
Modeling an Augmented Lagrangian for Blackbox Constrained OptimizationTechnometrics, 58
(1992)
The theory of radial basis function approximation in 1990
Sébastien Digabel, Stefan Wild (2015)
A Taxonomy of Constraints in Simulation-Based OptimizationarXiv: Optimization and Control
Andrew, J., Booker, Paul, D., Frankt, David, B., Serafini, Virginia, Torczon (1998)
A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogatesStructural optimization, 17
(1996)
User's documentation for MODFLOW-96: an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model
R. Fletcher, S. Leyffer (2002)
Nonlinear programming without a penalty functionMathematical Programming, 91
Juliane Müller, Tipaluck Krityakierne, C. Shoemaker (2014)
SO-MODS: Optimization for high dimensional computationally expensive multi-modal functions with surrogate search2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)
Stefan Wild, C. Shoemaker (2013)
Global Convergence of Radial Basis Function Trust-Region Algorithms for Derivative-Free OptimizationSIAM Rev., 55
R. Regis (2011)
Stochastic radial basis function algorithms for large-scale optimization involving expensive black-box objective and constraint functionsComput. Oper. Res., 38
Hans-Martin Gutmann (2001)
A Radial Basis Function Method for Global OptimizationJournal of Global Optimization, 19
Anirban Basudhar, C. Dribusch, Sylvain Lacaze, S. Missoum (2012)
Constrained efficient global optimization with support vector machinesStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 46
Juliane Müller, C. Shoemaker (2014)
Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problemsJournal of Global Optimization, 60
J. Nazareth (2010)
Introduction to derivative-free optimizationMath. Comput., 79
We introduce GOSAC, a global optimization algorithm for problems with computationally expensive black-box constraints and computationally cheap objective functions. The variables may be continuous, integer, or mixed-integer. GOSAC uses a two-phase optimization approach. The first phase aims at finding a feasible point by solving a multi-objective optimization problem in which the constraints are minimized simultaneously. The second phase aims at improving the feasible solution. In both phases, we use cubic radial basis function surrogate models to approximate the computationally expensive constraints. We iteratively select sample points by minimizing the computationally cheap objective function subject to the constraint function approximations. We assess GOSAC’s efficiency on computationally cheap test problems with integer, mixed-integer, and continuous variables and two environmental applications. We compare GOSAC to NOMAD and a genetic algorithm (GA). The results of the numerical experiments show that for a given budget of allowed expensive constraint evaluations, GOSAC finds better feasible solutions more efficiently than NOMAD and GA for most benchmark problems and both applications. GOSAC finds feasible solutions with a higher probability than NOMAD and GOSAC.
Journal of Global Optimization – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 28, 2017
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.