Going up DIEAP creek—Coventry and Warwickshire Plastic Surgery Department’s experience with lifeboats and paddles

Going up DIEAP creek—Coventry and Warwickshire Plastic Surgery Department’s experience with... The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap is arguably the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite its manifold advantages, potential flap failure, often secondary to venous congestion, is a devastating possible complication. An appropriate salvage procedure may avoid DIEAP flap loss. To identify, describe and analyse DIEAP flap salvage procedures carried out by the senior author (and Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital Plastic Surgery Clinical lead) who has a special interest in breast reconstruction, over an 8-year period. A retrospective analysis of notes and logbooks was carried out to identify DIEAP flap breast reconstructions that required salvage procedures involving anastomoses in addition to or other than the routine deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and vein (DIEV) to internal mammary artery and vein (IMV). One hundred twenty-seven DIEAP reconstructed cases were identified of which seven required lifeboat procedures: (1) piggy back chimeric DIEAP/TRAM flap, (2) double barrelling and trouser legging IMV and DIEVs, (3) contralateral perforator anastomosis to stump of main ipsilateral DIEA, (4) venous graft and anastomosis to cephalic vein, (5) venous anastomosis to thoracodorsal vein and (6) multiple rib resection for friable radiotherapy damaged vessels. The DIEAP flap is an increasingly popular method of providing autologous breast reconstruction with good volume and reliable perforators. However, surgeons may find that the recipient vessels of choice or the perforators alone are not adequate to maintain a healthy, viable flap. We hope that knowledge of this department’s salvage options may add to methods described in the literature and therefore the armamentarium of others when faced with similar problems. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Going up DIEAP creek—Coventry and Warwickshire Plastic Surgery Department’s experience with lifeboats and paddles

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/going-up-dieap-creek-coventry-and-warwickshire-plastic-surgery-ox498WwhZ0
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-010-0493-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap is arguably the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite its manifold advantages, potential flap failure, often secondary to venous congestion, is a devastating possible complication. An appropriate salvage procedure may avoid DIEAP flap loss. To identify, describe and analyse DIEAP flap salvage procedures carried out by the senior author (and Coventry and Warwickshire Hospital Plastic Surgery Clinical lead) who has a special interest in breast reconstruction, over an 8-year period. A retrospective analysis of notes and logbooks was carried out to identify DIEAP flap breast reconstructions that required salvage procedures involving anastomoses in addition to or other than the routine deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and vein (DIEV) to internal mammary artery and vein (IMV). One hundred twenty-seven DIEAP reconstructed cases were identified of which seven required lifeboat procedures: (1) piggy back chimeric DIEAP/TRAM flap, (2) double barrelling and trouser legging IMV and DIEVs, (3) contralateral perforator anastomosis to stump of main ipsilateral DIEA, (4) venous graft and anastomosis to cephalic vein, (5) venous anastomosis to thoracodorsal vein and (6) multiple rib resection for friable radiotherapy damaged vessels. The DIEAP flap is an increasingly popular method of providing autologous breast reconstruction with good volume and reliable perforators. However, surgeons may find that the recipient vessels of choice or the perforators alone are not adequate to maintain a healthy, viable flap. We hope that knowledge of this department’s salvage options may add to methods described in the literature and therefore the armamentarium of others when faced with similar problems.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2011

References

  • Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction
    Allen, RJ; Treece, P

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off