Göran L. Agren and Ernesto Bosatta, Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 (Reprinted in 1998)

Göran L. Agren and Ernesto Bosatta, Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Cambridge: Cambridge... Russian Journal of Ecology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2001, pp. 290–291. Translated from Ekologiya, No. 4, 2001, pp. 317–318. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by Pokarzhevskii. BOOK REVIEWS Göran L. Agren and Ernesto Bosatta, Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 (Reprinted in 1998) Mathematical simulation of the natural cycles of phosphorus, and sulfur cycles are regarded as similar nutrients has become a threadbare issue in the works and not connected tightly with the carbon cycle. This is published in Russia and worldwide during the past two contrary to the views of many our edaphologists and decades. Most models deal with global cycles, which ecologists, who postulate that carbon not only favors have, in my opinion, little to do with ecology. Simulation nitrogen uptake (fixation) and its involvement into bio- of the cycles of nutritious elements within ecosystems logical production, but also strictly determines the arouses less interest not only because these studies are cycles of other nutrients. not supported by the program “Global Changes,” but Like many edaphologists and ecologists, the authors also because the mechanisms of these cycles usually believe that decomposition of organic matter is the remain beyond the scope of both simulation and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Russian Journal of Ecology Springer Journals

Göran L. Agren and Ernesto Bosatta, Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 (Reprinted in 1998)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/g-ran-l-agren-and-ernesto-bosatta-theoretical-ecosystem-ecology-bjEbX0SUYb
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica”
Subject
Life Sciences; Ecology
ISSN
1067-4136
eISSN
1608-3334
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1011379008841
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Russian Journal of Ecology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2001, pp. 290–291. Translated from Ekologiya, No. 4, 2001, pp. 317–318. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by Pokarzhevskii. BOOK REVIEWS Göran L. Agren and Ernesto Bosatta, Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 (Reprinted in 1998) Mathematical simulation of the natural cycles of phosphorus, and sulfur cycles are regarded as similar nutrients has become a threadbare issue in the works and not connected tightly with the carbon cycle. This is published in Russia and worldwide during the past two contrary to the views of many our edaphologists and decades. Most models deal with global cycles, which ecologists, who postulate that carbon not only favors have, in my opinion, little to do with ecology. Simulation nitrogen uptake (fixation) and its involvement into bio- of the cycles of nutritious elements within ecosystems logical production, but also strictly determines the arouses less interest not only because these studies are cycles of other nutrients. not supported by the program “Global Changes,” but Like many edaphologists and ecologists, the authors also because the mechanisms of these cycles usually believe that decomposition of organic matter is the remain beyond the scope of both simulation and

Journal

Russian Journal of EcologySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 9, 2004

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off