Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Van Est, V. Rerimassie, van Keulen, G. Dorren (2014)
Intimate technology : the battle for our body and behaviour
M. Schermer (2011)
Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement—Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain StimulationNeuroethics, 6
L. Bolt, L. Bolt (2007)
True to oneself? Broad and narrow ideas on authenticity in the enhancement debateTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 28
J. Brenninkmeijer (2016)
Neurotechnologies of the Self: Mind, Brain and Subjectivity
(2013)
Brain blast . DIY attempts at electrical brain stimulation to improve cognition are to get easier
C. Bublitz, Reinhard Merkel (2009)
Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality TraitsWiley-Blackwell: Bioethics
A. Heinz, Roland Kipke, Hannah Heimann, U. Wiesing (2012)
Cognitive neuroenhancement: false assumptions in the ethical debateJournal of Medical Ethics, 38
(2007)
Defending Human Dignity
S. Žižek (2010)
Living in the end times
C. Poreisz, K. Boros, A. Antal, W. Paulus (2007)
Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patientsBrain Research Bulletin, 72
J. Lucke, Stephanie Bell, Brad Partridge, Wayne Hall (2011)
Academic doping or Viagra for the brain?EMBO reports, 12
J. Lacan (1969)
D'un autre à l'autre
D. Bartrés-Faz, D. Vidal-Piñeiro (2016)
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for the Study of Memory Enhancement in AgingEuropean Psychologist, 21
European Brain Council, Belgium; King's College London
M. Nitsche, L. Cohen, E. Wassermann, A. Priori, N. Lang, A. Antal, W. Paulus, F. Hummel, Paulo Boggio, F. Fregni, Á. Pascual-Leone (2008)
Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008Brain Stimulation, 1
W. Hall, J. Lucke (2010)
The enhancement use of neuropharmaceuticals: more scepticism and caution needed.Addiction, 105 12
(1966)
Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil
D. Seger (2005)
Parallax ViewClinical Toxicology, 43
P. Lemmens (2015)
Cognitive Enhancement and Anthropotechnological ChangeTechné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19
S. Liew, E. Santarnecchi, E. Buch, L. Cohen (2014)
Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: local and distant effects for motor recoveryFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8
(2016)
Performing the future: on the use of drama in philosophy courses for science students. Science and Education (online first)
F. Svenaeus (2009)
The ethics of self-change: becoming oneself by way of antidepressants or psychotherapy?Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 12
M. Vollebregt, M. Dongen-Boomsma, J. Buitelaar, D. Slaats-Willemse (2014)
Does EEG-neurofeedback improve neurocognitive functioning in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? A systematic review and a double-blind placebo-controlled study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 55 5
(2015)
NERRI WP3 Final report: presentation and analysis of 60 Mutual Learning Exercises
S. Rothman (2013)
Pediatric neuroenhancement: Ethical, legal, social, and neurodevelopmental implicationsNeurology, 81
M. Schermer, I. Bolt, R. Jongh, B. Olivier (2009)
The Future of Psychopharmacological Enhancements: Expectations and PoliciesNeuroethics, 2
(2016)
Rethinking cognitive enhancement: A critical appraisal of the neuroscience and ethics of cognitive enhancement
P. Lemmens (2017)
Cognitive Enhancement and Anthropotechnological Change: Towards an Organology and Pharmacology of Cognitive Enhancement Technologies
F. Fukuyama (2002)
Life, but not as we know it.New scientist, 174 2339
M. Lansbergen, M. Dongen-Boomsma, J. Buitelaar, D. Slaats-Willemse (2010)
ADHD and EEG-neurofeedback: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled feasibility studyJournal of Neural Transmission, 118
H. Zwart (2017)
‘Extimate’ technologies and techno-cultural discontent: A Lacanian analysis of pervasive gadgetsTechné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21
(1969)
Le séminaire XVII : L'envers de la psychanalyse
N. Bostrom, A. Sandberg (2009)
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory ChallengesScience and Engineering Ethics, 15
C. Forlini, J. Schildmann, P. Roser, R. Beranek, J. Vollmann (2015)
Knowledge, Experiences and Views of German University Students Toward Neuroenhancement: An Empirical-Ethical AnalysisNeuroethics, 8
B. Quednow (2010)
Erratum: Ethics of neuroenhancement: A phantom debateBioSocieties, 5
M. Foucault (1994)
Dits et écrits
Meika Loe, L. Cuttino (2008)
Grappling with the Medicated Self: The Case of ADHD College StudentsSymbolic Interaction, 31
D. DeGrazia (2005)
Enhancement technologies and human identity.The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 30 3
(1984)
The history of sexuality; vol. 2 The use of pleasure
M. Foucault (1984)
L'usage des plaisirs
C. Forlini, E. Racine (2012)
Stakeholder perspectives and reactions to “academic” cognitive enhancement: Unsuspected meaning of ambivalence and analogiesPublic Understanding of Science, 21
R. Sommers, Roy Dings, K. Neijenhuijs, Hannah Andringa, Sebastian Arts, Daphne Bult, Laura Klockenbusch, E. Wanningen, L. Bruin, Pim Haselager (2015)
A Young Scientists’ Perspective on DBS: A Plea for an International DBS OrganizationNeuroethics, 8
H. Zwart (2015)
Extimate technologies: Empowerment, Intrusiveness, Surveillance: The fate of the human subject in the age of intimate technologies and Big Data
Tais Moriyama, G. Polanczyk, A. Caye, T. Banaschewski, D. Brandeis, L. Rohde (2012)
Evidence-Based Information on the Clinical Use of Neurofeedback for ADHDNeurotherapeutics, 9
V. Cakic (2009)
Smart drugs for cognitive enhancement: ethical and pragmatic considerations in the era of cosmetic neurologyJournal of Medical Ethics, 35
(2011)
Rethinking the thinking cap ethics of neural enhancement using noninvasive brain stimulation
H. Maslen, J. Pugh, J. Savulescu (2015)
The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia NervosaNeuroethics, 8
(2008)
Humanity 2.0? Enhancement, evolution and the possible futures of humanity
J. Harvey (2008)
Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better PeopleJAMA, 299
Zack Lynch (2004)
Neurotechnology and Society (2010–2060)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013
H. Zwart (2016)
The obliteration of life: depersonalization and disembodiment in the terabyte eraNew Genetics and Society, 35
Sarah Chan, J. Harris (2006)
Cognitive regeneration or enhancement: the ethical issues.Regenerative medicine, 1 3
Stephan Schleim, B. Quednow (2017)
Debunking the ethical neuroenhancement debate
A. Mohamed (2014)
Neuroethical issues in pharmacological cognitive enhancement.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 5 5
C. Ragan, I. Bárd, I. Singh (2013)
What should we do about student use of cognitive enhancers? An analysis of current evidenceNeuropharmacology, 64
M. Houellebecq (1999)
Les particules élémentairesWorld Literature Today, 73
T. Swierstra (2015)
Identifying the normative challenges posed by technology’s ‘soft’ impactsEtikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 9
Nicholas Fitz, Roland Nadler, Praveena Manogaran, Eugene Chong, P. Reiner (2014)
Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive EnhancementNeuroethics, 7
L. Floridi (2012)
Technologies of the SelfPhilosophy & Technology, 25
(1984)
Histoire de la sexualité 2: L ’ usage des plaisirs . Paris: Gallimard. [Foucault, M. (1992)
B. Quednow (2010)
Ethics of neuroenhancement: A phantom debateBioSocieties, 5
A. Franke, R. Northoff, E. Hildt (2015)
The Case of Pharmacological Neuroenhancement: Medical, Judicial and Ethical Aspects from a German PerspectivePharmacopsychiatry, 48
Since the 1990’s, the debate concerning the ethical, legal and societal aspects of ‘neuro-enhancement’ has evolved into a massive discourse, both in the public realm and in the academic arena. This ethical debate, however, tends to repeat the same sets of arguments over and over again. Normative disagreements between transhumanists and bioconservatives on invasive or radical brain stimulators, and uncertainties regarding the use and effectivity of nootropic pharmaceuticals dominate the field. Building on the results of an extensive European project on responsible research and innovation in neuro-enhancement (NERRI), we observe and encourage that the debate is now entering a new and, as we will argue, more realistic and societally relevant stage. This new stage concerns those technologies that enter the market as ostensibly harmless contrivances that consumers may use for self-care or entertainment. We use the examples and arguments of participants in NERRI debates to describe three case studies of such purportedly innocent ‘toys’. Based upon this empirical material, we argue that these ‘soft’ enhancement gadgets are situated somewhere in the boundary zone between the internal and the external, between the intimate and the intrusive, between the familiar and the unfamiliar, between the friendly and the scary and, in Foucauldian terms, between technologies of the self and technologies of control. Therefore, we describe their physiognomy with the help of a term borrowed from Jacques Lacan, namely as “extimate” technologies.
Neuroethics – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 2, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.