Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Sabatini, Jane Shore, Steven Holtzman, H. Scarborough (2011)
Relative Effectiveness of Reading Intervention Programs for Adults With Low LiteracyJournal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4
(2010)
Reading interventions for older students
Jan Frijters, M. Lovett, K. Steinbach, M. Wolf, R. Sevcik, R. Morris (2011)
Neurocognitive Predictors of Reading Outcomes for Children With Reading DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 44
M. Lovett, Léa Lacerenza, Maria Palma, Jan Frijters (2012)
Evaluating the Efficacy of Remediation for Struggling Readers in High SchoolJournal of Learning Disabilities, 45
Amy Barth, K. Stuebing, Jason Anthony, Carolyn Denton, Patricia Mathes, J. Fletcher, D. Francis (2008)
Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status.Learning and individual differences, 18 3
D. Rogosa, D. Brandt, M. Zimowski (1982)
A growth curve approach to the measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 92
D. Magnusson, V. Allen (1983)
Human development : an interactional perspective
(2008)
Interventions for reading difficulties : A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers
J. Wittenberg, H. Fineberg (1980)
Evaluating efficacy.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 134 6
Stephanie Otaiba, D. Fuchs (2002)
Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy InterventionRemedial and Special Education, 23
G. Hitch, M. Halliday (1983)
Working memory in childrenPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 302
T. Snijders, R. Bosker (1999)
Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling
D. Compton (2000)
Modeling the response of normally achieving and at-risk first grade children to word reading instructionAnnals of Dyslexia, 50
Todd Glover, S. Vaughn (2010)
The Promise of Response to Intervention: Evaluating Current Science and Practice.Guilford Publications
(1999)
Reading research for students with learning disabilities : A meta - analysis of intervention outcomes
D. Rogosa, J. Willett (1983)
DEMONSTRATING THE RELIABILITY THE DIFFERENCE SCORE IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CHANGEJournal of Educational Measurement, 20
R. Morris, M. Lovett, M. Wolf, R. Sevcik, K. Steinbach, Jan Frijters, Marla Shapiro (2012)
Multiple-Component Remediation for Developmental Reading DisabilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 45
A. Bryk, S. Raudenbush (1987)
Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing ChangePsychological Bulletin, 101
RD Morris, MW Lovett, M Wolf, RA Sevcik, KA Steinbach, JC Frijters (2012)
Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, SES, and race as factors on remedial outcomeJournal of Learning Disabilities, 45
(1995)
Myths and methods: ‘‘Myths About Longitudinal Research’
A. Sandler (2001)
Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilitiesJournal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22
JD Singer, JB Willet (2003)
Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence
Rolando Tiu, L. Thompson, B. Lewis (2003)
The Role of IQ in a Component Model of ReadingJournal of Learning Disabilities, 36
M. Edmonds, S. Vaughn, J. Wexler, C. Reutebuch, A. Cable, K. Tackett, Jennifer Schnakenberg (2009)
A Synthesis of Reading Interventions and Effects on Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Older Struggling ReadersReview of Educational Research, 79
J. Kromrey, L. Foster-Johnson (1996)
Determining the Efficacy of Intervention: The Use of Effect Sizes for Data Analysis in Single-Subject ResearchJournal of Experimental Education, 65
S. Chinn (2000)
A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis.Statistics in medicine, 19 22
S. Gathercole, T. Alloway, C. Willis, Anne-Marie Adams (2006)
Working memory in children with reading disabilities.Journal of experimental child psychology, 93 3
P. Yoder, D. Compton (2004)
Identifying predictors of treatment response.Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 10 3
H Scarborough (2001)
Handbook for research in early literacy
H. Swanson, Guy Trainin, Denise Necoechea, D. Hammill (2003)
Rapid Naming, Phonological Awareness, and Reading: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlation EvidenceReview of Educational Research, 73
(1983)
An interactional perspective for human development
M. Lovett, Léa Lacerenza, Susan Borden, Jan Frijters, K. Steinbach, Maria Palma (2000)
Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92
S Al Otaiba, D Fuchs (2002)
Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literatureRemedial and Special Education, 23
RK Olson, B Wise, J Ring, M Johnson (1997)
Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognitionScientific Studies of Reading, 1
R. Wagner, J. Torgesen (1987)
The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills.Psychological Bulletin, 101
B. Muthén, L. Muthén (2000)
Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 24 6
S. Bauer, M. Lambert, S. Nielsen (2004)
Clinical Significance Methods: A Comparison of Statistical TechniquesJournal of Personality Assessment, 82
P. Cirino, Fontina Rashid, R. Sevcik, M. Lovett, Jan Frijters, M. Wolf, R. Morris (2002)
Psychometric Stability of Nationally Normed and Experimental Decoding and Related Measures in Children with Reading DisabilityJournal of Learning Disabilities, 35
D Magnusson, LR Bergman (1988)
Studies of psychosocial risk: The power of longitudinal data
(1996)
Cross - domain analysis of change over time : Combining growth modeling and covariance structure analysis
Line Brager-Larsen, K. Sundet, H. Engvik, Beate Ørbeck, R. Nes (2001)
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF A NORWEGIAN RESEARCH VERSION OF THE 'WECHSLER ABBREVIATED SCALE OF INTELLIGENCE' (WASI)
D. Compton (2003)
Modeling the Relationship between Growth in Rapid Naming Speed and Growth in Decoding Skill in First-Grade Children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 95
R. Dumont, John Willis (2008)
Woodcock‐Johnson III Tests of Achievement
R. Bruno, Stephen Walker (1999)
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP)Assessment for Effective Intervention, 24
J. Overall (1994)
Issues in the design and analysis of controlled clinical trials.Journal of clinical psychology, 50 1
B. Wise, J. Ring, Luann Sessions, R. Olson (1997)
Phonological Awareness with and without Articulation: A Preliminary StudyLearning Disability Quarterly, 20
(2010)
IBM SPSS statistics (version 19.0)
JJ McArdle (2001)
Structural equation modeling: Present and future
N. Temkin (2004)
Standard error in the Jacobson and Truax Reliable Change Index: The “classical approach” leads to poor estimatesJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10
JK Torgesen, AW Alexander, RK Wagner, CA Rashotte, KKS Voeller, T Conway (2001)
Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approachesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 34
RW Woodcock, KS McGrew, N Mather (2001)
Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement (WJ-III)
K. Aunola, E. Leskinen, Tiina Onatsu-Arvilommi, J. Nurmi (2002)
Three methods for studying developmental change: a case of reading skills and self-concept.The British journal of educational psychology, 72 Pt 3
D Wechsler (1999)
Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI)
M. W. Lovett, L. Lacerenza, S. L. Borden (2000)
Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy‐based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 33
J. Torgesen, R. Wagner, C. Rashotte, Ann Alexander, T. Conway (1997)
Preventive and Remedial Interventions for Children with Severe Reading DisabilitiesLearning Disabilities: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 8
D. Greenberg, Justin Wise, R. Morris, L. Fredrick, V. Rodrigo, Alice Nanda, Hye Pae (2011)
A Randomized Control Study of Instructional Approaches for Struggling Adult ReadersJournal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4
D. Magnusson, L. Bergman (1988)
Individual and variable-based approaches to longitudinal research on early risk factors.
G. Maassen (2004)
The standard error in the Jacobson and Truax Reliable Change Index: The classical approach to the assessment of reliable changeJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10
J. Nelson, Gregory Benner, Jorge Gonzalez (2003)
Learner Characteristics that Influence the Treatment Effectiveness of Early Literacy Interventions: A Meta–Analytic ReviewLearning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18
L. Christensen, J. Mendoza (1986)
A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC indexBehavior Therapy, 17
D. Francis, S. Shaywitz, K. Stuebing, B. Shaywitz, J. Fletcher (1996)
Developmental Lag versus Deficit Models of Reading Disability: A Longitudinal, Individual Growth Curves Analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88
J. McGlinchey, David Atkins, N. Jacobson (2002)
Clinical significance methods: Which one to use and how useful are they?Behavior Therapy, 33
N. Jacobson, W. Follette, D. Revenstorf (1984)
Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significanceBehavior Therapy, 15
(1988)
Reliable change criterion calculator
B. Foorman, D. Francis, J. Fletcher, C. Schatschneider, P. Mehta (1998)
The Role of Instruction in Learning To Read: Preventing Reading Failure in At-Risk Children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90
D. Smart, A. Sanson, M. Prior (1996)
Connections between reading disability and behavior problems: Testing temporal and causal hypothesesJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24
(2001)
Connecting early language and literacy to later reading ( dis ) abilities : Evidence , theory , and practice
F. Vellutino, D. Scanlon, G. Lyon (2000)
Differentiating Between Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor ReadersJournal of Learning Disabilities, 33
Y. Cheong, A. Bryk (2000)
HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling
DR Rogosa (1995)
The analysis of change
P. Beeson, R. Robey (2006)
Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia LiteratureNeuropsychology Review, 16
M. Lovett, Léa Lacerenza, Susan Borden (2000)
Putting Struggling Readers on the PHAST TrackJournal of Learning Disabilities, 33
Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg (1995)
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testingJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 57
(2001)
A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis
J. Fletcher, K. Stuebing, Amy Barth, Carolyn Denton, P. Cirino, D. Francis, S. Vaughn (2011)
Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading InterventionSchool Psychology Review, 40
F. Vellutino, D. Scanlon, Edward Sipay, Sheila Small, A. Pratt, R. Chen, M. Denckla (1996)
Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disabilityJournal of Educational Psychology, 88
L. Fuchs (2003)
Assessing Intervention Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical IssuesLearning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18
The results from controlled intervention research have indicated that effective reading interventions exist for children with reading difficulties. Effect sizes for older struggling readers, however, typically have not matched the large effects demonstrated with younger children. Standardized effect sizes for intervention/control comparisons obscure important individual differences within intervention and control groups—differences potentially relevant to the who and why of intervention success. The present study reports the outcomes of PHAST Reading, a research-based multiple component reading intervention. Participants were 270 Grade 6, 7, and 8 students reading significantly below age-level expectations, who participated in a year-long intensive small-group intervention. Four methods were applied to characterize individual change: (a) normalization relative to age-appropriate standards; (b) statistically-reliable pre–post change using the Jacobson–Truax index; (c) individually-estimated growth rates using hierarchical linear modeling; and (d) change to a fixed criterion across multiple measures. Each method was evaluated for its ability to identify intervention outcomes, replicate traditional group-based effect size metrics, and characterize individual differences across participants depending on whether change was demonstrated. Each method replicated traditional group-based effect sizes, with advantages in consistency and predictive power for the reliable change index and growth curve approaches.
Reading and Writing – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 9, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.