Forehead lipoma excision: a comparative study of open versus endoscopic technique

Forehead lipoma excision: a comparative study of open versus endoscopic technique Eur J Plast Surg (2016) 39:415–420 DOI 10.1007/s00238-016-1225-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Forehead lipoma excision: a comparative study of open versus endoscopic technique 1 1 1 1 Hui Wen Ng & Yew Ming Samuel Ho & Siyun Michelle Ho & Sze-Wei Matthew Yeo & Thien Chong Marcus Wong Received: 17 April 2016 /Accepted: 15 July 2016 /Published online: 5 August 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract in the open excision group (p =1). All38patientsinthe Background Endoscopic excision of forehead lipoma is endoscopic group were satisfied with their scars compared increasingly utilized for its inconspicuous scarring, good with 4/24 (16.7 %) in the open excision group who re- intraoperative visualization and low complication rates. ported dissatisfaction (p =0.02). Currently, studies comparing outcomes from endoscopic Conclusions Complication rates of both surgical techniques and open excision of forehead lipomas are lacking. This are similar. Given that the endoscopic technique results in retrospective study compares the surgical outcomes of the cosmetically superior outcomes, with no increase in morbidi- two techniques. ty, the authors recommend the use of endoscopic technique for Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed medical re- forehead lipoma excision. cords of all patients who had undergone forehead lipoma Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Forehead lipoma excision: a comparative study of open versus endoscopic technique

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/forehead-lipoma-excision-a-comparative-study-of-open-versus-endoscopic-T4px5StjdF
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-016-1225-3
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Plast Surg (2016) 39:415–420 DOI 10.1007/s00238-016-1225-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Forehead lipoma excision: a comparative study of open versus endoscopic technique 1 1 1 1 Hui Wen Ng & Yew Ming Samuel Ho & Siyun Michelle Ho & Sze-Wei Matthew Yeo & Thien Chong Marcus Wong Received: 17 April 2016 /Accepted: 15 July 2016 /Published online: 5 August 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract in the open excision group (p =1). All38patientsinthe Background Endoscopic excision of forehead lipoma is endoscopic group were satisfied with their scars compared increasingly utilized for its inconspicuous scarring, good with 4/24 (16.7 %) in the open excision group who re- intraoperative visualization and low complication rates. ported dissatisfaction (p =0.02). Currently, studies comparing outcomes from endoscopic Conclusions Complication rates of both surgical techniques and open excision of forehead lipomas are lacking. This are similar. Given that the endoscopic technique results in retrospective study compares the surgical outcomes of the cosmetically superior outcomes, with no increase in morbidi- two techniques. ty, the authors recommend the use of endoscopic technique for Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed medical re- forehead lipoma excision. cords of all patients who had undergone forehead lipoma Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Aug 5, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off