Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline measures

Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline... Being a skilled reader means being able to process a text both superficially and deeply. However, international assessments show that 15 year-old students continue to have difficulty in understanding a text deeply. The aim of this study was to examine the differentiated contribution of several facets of self-regulation in the understanding of a text at different levels among skilled and less-skilled readers. To this end, we collected both online (reading traces) and offline (metacognitive judgments) data. The reading processes of 55 final-year secondary school students (15–16 years old) were captured while reading an expository text. Afterwards they answered superficial and deep comprehension questions and judged their level of confidence in their answers after each question. The accuracy of these judgments was determined through the calculation of bias indices. Analyses of the students’ online reading traces enabled us to identify four distinct patterns of processes: Linear reading, linear rereading, linear reading with selective rereading, and reading with online rereading. Overall, less-skilled readers approached the text more linearly and routinely, while skilled readers were more flexible. Furthermore, offline bias measures were lower for superficial (vs. deep) comprehension questions and for skilled (vs. less-skilled) readers. Online and offline measures were significantly interrelated pointing to a common underlying skill. Last but not least, both online and offline measures significantly predicted performance beyond readers’ comprehension skill, but played different roles in superficial and deep comprehension. These findings highlight the importance of self-regulated comprehension, especially the role of active online monitoring when reading for deep comprehension. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reading and Writing Springer Journals

Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline measures

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/flexible-self-regulated-reading-as-a-cue-for-deep-comprehension-0z0TXeTVgz
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Linguistics; Languages and Literature; Psycholinguistics; Education (general); Neurology; Interdisciplinary Studies
ISSN
0922-4777
eISSN
1573-0905
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11145-015-9547-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Being a skilled reader means being able to process a text both superficially and deeply. However, international assessments show that 15 year-old students continue to have difficulty in understanding a text deeply. The aim of this study was to examine the differentiated contribution of several facets of self-regulation in the understanding of a text at different levels among skilled and less-skilled readers. To this end, we collected both online (reading traces) and offline (metacognitive judgments) data. The reading processes of 55 final-year secondary school students (15–16 years old) were captured while reading an expository text. Afterwards they answered superficial and deep comprehension questions and judged their level of confidence in their answers after each question. The accuracy of these judgments was determined through the calculation of bias indices. Analyses of the students’ online reading traces enabled us to identify four distinct patterns of processes: Linear reading, linear rereading, linear reading with selective rereading, and reading with online rereading. Overall, less-skilled readers approached the text more linearly and routinely, while skilled readers were more flexible. Furthermore, offline bias measures were lower for superficial (vs. deep) comprehension questions and for skilled (vs. less-skilled) readers. Online and offline measures were significantly interrelated pointing to a common underlying skill. Last but not least, both online and offline measures significantly predicted performance beyond readers’ comprehension skill, but played different roles in superficial and deep comprehension. These findings highlight the importance of self-regulated comprehension, especially the role of active online monitoring when reading for deep comprehension.

Journal

Reading and WritingSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 4, 2015

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off