Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline measures

Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline... Being a skilled reader means being able to process a text both superficially and deeply. However, international assessments show that 15 year-old students continue to have difficulty in understanding a text deeply. The aim of this study was to examine the differentiated contribution of several facets of self-regulation in the understanding of a text at different levels among skilled and less-skilled readers. To this end, we collected both online (reading traces) and offline (metacognitive judgments) data. The reading processes of 55 final-year secondary school students (15–16 years old) were captured while reading an expository text. Afterwards they answered superficial and deep comprehension questions and judged their level of confidence in their answers after each question. The accuracy of these judgments was determined through the calculation of bias indices. Analyses of the students’ online reading traces enabled us to identify four distinct patterns of processes: Linear reading, linear rereading, linear reading with selective rereading, and reading with online rereading. Overall, less-skilled readers approached the text more linearly and routinely, while skilled readers were more flexible. Furthermore, offline bias measures were lower for superficial (vs. deep) comprehension questions and for skilled (vs. less-skilled) readers. Online and offline measures were significantly interrelated pointing to a common underlying skill. Last but not least, both online and offline measures significantly predicted performance beyond readers’ comprehension skill, but played different roles in superficial and deep comprehension. These findings highlight the importance of self-regulated comprehension, especially the role of active online monitoring when reading for deep comprehension. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reading and Writing Springer Journals

Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline measures

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/flexible-self-regulated-reading-as-a-cue-for-deep-comprehension-0z0TXeTVgz
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Linguistics; Languages and Literature; Psycholinguistics; Education (general); Neurology; Interdisciplinary Studies
ISSN
0922-4777
eISSN
1573-0905
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11145-015-9547-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Being a skilled reader means being able to process a text both superficially and deeply. However, international assessments show that 15 year-old students continue to have difficulty in understanding a text deeply. The aim of this study was to examine the differentiated contribution of several facets of self-regulation in the understanding of a text at different levels among skilled and less-skilled readers. To this end, we collected both online (reading traces) and offline (metacognitive judgments) data. The reading processes of 55 final-year secondary school students (15–16 years old) were captured while reading an expository text. Afterwards they answered superficial and deep comprehension questions and judged their level of confidence in their answers after each question. The accuracy of these judgments was determined through the calculation of bias indices. Analyses of the students’ online reading traces enabled us to identify four distinct patterns of processes: Linear reading, linear rereading, linear reading with selective rereading, and reading with online rereading. Overall, less-skilled readers approached the text more linearly and routinely, while skilled readers were more flexible. Furthermore, offline bias measures were lower for superficial (vs. deep) comprehension questions and for skilled (vs. less-skilled) readers. Online and offline measures were significantly interrelated pointing to a common underlying skill. Last but not least, both online and offline measures significantly predicted performance beyond readers’ comprehension skill, but played different roles in superficial and deep comprehension. These findings highlight the importance of self-regulated comprehension, especially the role of active online monitoring when reading for deep comprehension.

Journal

Reading and WritingSpringer Journals

Published: Feb 4, 2015

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off