Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised?

Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised? In January 2002, the Multiprofessional Skin Cancer Committee published guidelines on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We have undertaken a survey amongst plastic surgeons in the UK in order to establish the current standards for excision margins of SCC. There was no consensus on the excision margin to be taken for an SCC, nor was there any agreement as to whether a completely excised SCC ever warranted further excision. Furthermore, the majority of surgeons would take a wider margin for SCC on the limbs, but not for those on the head and neck. This is in contrast to the guidelines, which recommend a larger margin for the high-risk sites of the ear, lip, scalp, eyelids and nose. In addition, most pathology reports comment on completeness of excision margins but only few mention the depth of the tumour. We discuss the evidence behind the current guidelines and look at areas for improvement in the standardisation of the management of SCC. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/excision-margin-for-cutaneous-squamous-cell-carcinoma-is-it-vnkKeyf2KQ
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-004-0634-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In January 2002, the Multiprofessional Skin Cancer Committee published guidelines on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We have undertaken a survey amongst plastic surgeons in the UK in order to establish the current standards for excision margins of SCC. There was no consensus on the excision margin to be taken for an SCC, nor was there any agreement as to whether a completely excised SCC ever warranted further excision. Furthermore, the majority of surgeons would take a wider margin for SCC on the limbs, but not for those on the head and neck. This is in contrast to the guidelines, which recommend a larger margin for the high-risk sites of the ear, lip, scalp, eyelids and nose. In addition, most pathology reports comment on completeness of excision margins but only few mention the depth of the tumour. We discuss the evidence behind the current guidelines and look at areas for improvement in the standardisation of the management of SCC.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off