Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised?

Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised? In January 2002, the Multiprofessional Skin Cancer Committee published guidelines on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We have undertaken a survey amongst plastic surgeons in the UK in order to establish the current standards for excision margins of SCC. There was no consensus on the excision margin to be taken for an SCC, nor was there any agreement as to whether a completely excised SCC ever warranted further excision. Furthermore, the majority of surgeons would take a wider margin for SCC on the limbs, but not for those on the head and neck. This is in contrast to the guidelines, which recommend a larger margin for the high-risk sites of the ear, lip, scalp, eyelids and nose. In addition, most pathology reports comment on completeness of excision margins but only few mention the depth of the tumour. We discuss the evidence behind the current guidelines and look at areas for improvement in the standardisation of the management of SCC. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/excision-margin-for-cutaneous-squamous-cell-carcinoma-is-it-vnkKeyf2KQ
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-004-0634-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In January 2002, the Multiprofessional Skin Cancer Committee published guidelines on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We have undertaken a survey amongst plastic surgeons in the UK in order to establish the current standards for excision margins of SCC. There was no consensus on the excision margin to be taken for an SCC, nor was there any agreement as to whether a completely excised SCC ever warranted further excision. Furthermore, the majority of surgeons would take a wider margin for SCC on the limbs, but not for those on the head and neck. This is in contrast to the guidelines, which recommend a larger margin for the high-risk sites of the ear, lip, scalp, eyelids and nose. In addition, most pathology reports comment on completeness of excision margins but only few mention the depth of the tumour. We discuss the evidence behind the current guidelines and look at areas for improvement in the standardisation of the management of SCC.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off