Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluation of the Needle Positioning Accuracy of a Light Puncture Robot Under MRI Guidance: Results of a Clinical Trial on Healthy Volunteers

Evaluation of the Needle Positioning Accuracy of a Light Puncture Robot Under MRI Guidance:... Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2001-5 TECHNICAL NOTE Evaluation of the Needle Positioning Accuracy of a Light Puncture Robot Under MRI Guidance: Results of a Clinical Trial on Healthy Volunteers 1 2,3,4,5 6 • • • Julien Ghelfi Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry Nikolai Hungr 6 6 4,7,8 4,7,8 • • • • Ce´line Fouard Baptiste Ve´ron Maud Medici Emilie Chipon 6 1 Philippe Cinquin Ivan Bricault Received: 8 December 2017 / Accepted: 26 May 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2018 Abstract procedure time for one trajectory was 12.9 min [10.2; 18.0] Purpose To assess the accuracy of Light Puncture Robot and median installation time was 9.0 min [6.0; 13.0]. (LPR) as a patient-mounted robot, in positioning a sham Conclusion LPR accuracy in the deployment of a sham needle under MRI guidance for abdominal percutaneous needle inside the MRI tunnel and its setup time are interventions. promising. Further studies need to be conducted to confirm Materials and Methods This monocentric, prospective and these results before clinical trials. non-controlled study was approved by the ethics review board. The study evaluated the accuracy of LPR V3 to Keywords Percutaneous interventions  MRI http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Springer Journals

Evaluation of the Needle Positioning Accuracy of a Light Puncture Robot Under MRI Guidance: Results of a Clinical Trial on Healthy Volunteers

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/evaluation-of-the-needle-positioning-accuracy-of-a-light-puncture-vu4qmuSTS7
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE)
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Imaging / Radiology; Cardiology; Nuclear Medicine; Ultrasound
ISSN
0174-1551
eISSN
1432-086X
DOI
10.1007/s00270-018-2001-5
pmid
29876597
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2001-5 TECHNICAL NOTE Evaluation of the Needle Positioning Accuracy of a Light Puncture Robot Under MRI Guidance: Results of a Clinical Trial on Healthy Volunteers 1 2,3,4,5 6 • • • Julien Ghelfi Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry Nikolai Hungr 6 6 4,7,8 4,7,8 • • • • Ce´line Fouard Baptiste Ve´ron Maud Medici Emilie Chipon 6 1 Philippe Cinquin Ivan Bricault Received: 8 December 2017 / Accepted: 26 May 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2018 Abstract procedure time for one trajectory was 12.9 min [10.2; 18.0] Purpose To assess the accuracy of Light Puncture Robot and median installation time was 9.0 min [6.0; 13.0]. (LPR) as a patient-mounted robot, in positioning a sham Conclusion LPR accuracy in the deployment of a sham needle under MRI guidance for abdominal percutaneous needle inside the MRI tunnel and its setup time are interventions. promising. Further studies need to be conducted to confirm Materials and Methods This monocentric, prospective and these results before clinical trials. non-controlled study was approved by the ethics review board. The study evaluated the accuracy of LPR V3 to Keywords Percutaneous interventions  MRI

Journal

CardioVascular and Interventional RadiologySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 6, 2018

References