Evaluation and clinical correlation of practical cut-offs for visual rating scales of atrophy: normal aging versus mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

Evaluation and clinical correlation of practical cut-offs for visual rating scales of atrophy:... Age-related brain atrophy is a common finding, but neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease are associated with accelerated atrophy of the medial temporal lobe. In current practice for brain atrophy evaluation, several rating scales are being used such as the medial temporal atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy-frontal subscale (GCA-F) and posterior atrophy (PA) scales. Practical cut-offs to differentiate between normal and advanced brain atrophy are needed, because of their possible usefulness as a biomarker. A retrospective study was performed over a 1-year period resulting in a total of 79 subjects [27 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 27 patients with minimal cognitive impairment (MCI) and 25 control subjects]. The MTA, GCA-F and PA scales were applied blinded and independent by two raters. Possible age- and disease-related cut-offs were computed. The MTA scale showed significantly better diagnostic performances and inter-rater agreement than the PA and GCA-F scales. We could not confirm the suggested MTA cut-off for each decade. However, an MTA score of >1 and >1.75 was considered pathological, respectively, in the population under and over 70 years. MTA can be of use in making distinction between age-related atrophy and abnormal increase of atrophy. Systematic assessment of regional brain atrophy through the use of MTA in MRI images could be a useful biomarker in aiding the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Acta Neurologica Belgica Springer Journals

Evaluation and clinical correlation of practical cut-offs for visual rating scales of atrophy: normal aging versus mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/evaluation-and-clinical-correlation-of-practical-cut-offs-for-visual-pbn8PrA9lY
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Belgian Neurological Society
Subject
Biomedicine; Neurosciences; Neurology; Neuroradiology; Medicine/Public Health, general
ISSN
0300-9009
eISSN
2240-2993
D.O.I.
10.1007/s13760-017-0777-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Age-related brain atrophy is a common finding, but neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease are associated with accelerated atrophy of the medial temporal lobe. In current practice for brain atrophy evaluation, several rating scales are being used such as the medial temporal atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy-frontal subscale (GCA-F) and posterior atrophy (PA) scales. Practical cut-offs to differentiate between normal and advanced brain atrophy are needed, because of their possible usefulness as a biomarker. A retrospective study was performed over a 1-year period resulting in a total of 79 subjects [27 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 27 patients with minimal cognitive impairment (MCI) and 25 control subjects]. The MTA, GCA-F and PA scales were applied blinded and independent by two raters. Possible age- and disease-related cut-offs were computed. The MTA scale showed significantly better diagnostic performances and inter-rater agreement than the PA and GCA-F scales. We could not confirm the suggested MTA cut-off for each decade. However, an MTA score of >1 and >1.75 was considered pathological, respectively, in the population under and over 70 years. MTA can be of use in making distinction between age-related atrophy and abnormal increase of atrophy. Systematic assessment of regional brain atrophy through the use of MTA in MRI images could be a useful biomarker in aiding the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.

Journal

Acta Neurologica BelgicaSpringer Journals

Published: Apr 10, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off