Error performance of optically preamplified hybrid BPSK-PPM systems with transmitter and receiver imperfections

Error performance of optically preamplified hybrid BPSK-PPM systems with transmitter and receiver... In this paper, we investigate the impact of the transmitter finite extinction ratio and the receiver carrier recovery phase offset on the error performance of two optically preamplified hybrid M-ary pulse position modulation (PPM) systems with coherent detection. The first system, referred to as PB-mPPM, combines polarization division multiplexing (PDM) with binary phase-shift keying and M-ary PPM, and the other system, referred to as PQ-mPPM, combines PDM with quadrature phase-shift keying and M-ary PPM. We provide new expressions for the probability of bit error for PB-mPPM and PQ-mPPM under finite extinction ratios and phase offset. The extinction ratio study indicates that the coherent systems PB-mPPM and PQ-mPPM outperform the direct-detection ones. It also shows that at $$P_b=10^{-9}$$ P b = 10 - 9 PB-mPPM has a slight advantage over PQ-mPPM. For example, for a symbol size $$M=16$$ M = 16 and extinction ratio $$r=30$$ r = 30  dB, PB-mPPM requires 0.6 dB less SNR per bit than PQ-mPPM to achieve $$P_b=10^{-9}$$ P b = 10 - 9 . This investigation demonstrates that PB-mPPM is less complex and less sensitive to the variations of the offset angle $$\theta $$ θ than PQ-mPPM. For instance, for $$M=16$$ M = 16 , $$r=30$$ r = 30  dB, and $$\theta =10^{\circ }$$ θ = 10 ∘ PB-mPPM requires 1.6 dB less than PQ-mPPM to achieve $$P_b=10^{-9}$$ P b = 10 - 9 . However, PB-mPPM enhanced robustness to phase offset comes at the expense of a reduced bandwidth efficiency when compared to PQ-mPPM. For example, for $$M=2$$ M = 2 its bandwidth efficiency is 60 % that of PQ-mPPM and $$\approx 86\,\%$$ ≈ 86 % for $$M=1024$$ M = 1024 . For these reasons, PB-mPPM can be considered a reasonable design trade-off for M-ary PPM systems. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Photonic Network Communications Springer Journals

Error performance of optically preamplified hybrid BPSK-PPM systems with transmitter and receiver imperfections

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/error-performance-of-optically-preamplified-hybrid-bpsk-ppm-systems-JrbTNeb4iT
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Computer Science; Computer Communication Networks; Electrical Engineering; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
ISSN
1387-974X
eISSN
1572-8188
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11107-016-0636-1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the impact of the transmitter finite extinction ratio and the receiver carrier recovery phase offset on the error performance of two optically preamplified hybrid M-ary pulse position modulation (PPM) systems with coherent detection. The first system, referred to as PB-mPPM, combines polarization division multiplexing (PDM) with binary phase-shift keying and M-ary PPM, and the other system, referred to as PQ-mPPM, combines PDM with quadrature phase-shift keying and M-ary PPM. We provide new expressions for the probability of bit error for PB-mPPM and PQ-mPPM under finite extinction ratios and phase offset. The extinction ratio study indicates that the coherent systems PB-mPPM and PQ-mPPM outperform the direct-detection ones. It also shows that at $$P_b=10^{-9}$$ P b = 10 - 9 PB-mPPM has a slight advantage over PQ-mPPM. For example, for a symbol size $$M=16$$ M = 16 and extinction ratio $$r=30$$ r = 30  dB, PB-mPPM requires 0.6 dB less SNR per bit than PQ-mPPM to achieve $$P_b=10^{-9}$$ P b = 10 - 9 . This investigation demonstrates that PB-mPPM is less complex and less sensitive to the variations of the offset angle $$\theta $$ θ than PQ-mPPM. For instance, for $$M=16$$ M = 16 , $$r=30$$ r = 30  dB, and $$\theta =10^{\circ }$$ θ = 10 ∘ PB-mPPM requires 1.6 dB less than PQ-mPPM to achieve $$P_b=10^{-9}$$ P b = 10 - 9 . However, PB-mPPM enhanced robustness to phase offset comes at the expense of a reduced bandwidth efficiency when compared to PQ-mPPM. For example, for $$M=2$$ M = 2 its bandwidth efficiency is 60 % that of PQ-mPPM and $$\approx 86\,\%$$ ≈ 86 % for $$M=1024$$ M = 1024 . For these reasons, PB-mPPM can be considered a reasonable design trade-off for M-ary PPM systems.

Journal

Photonic Network CommunicationsSpringer Journals

Published: May 18, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off