Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
with the extrapolated line at (F(R) × E) = 0, where E is the incident photon energy (hν). Optical bandgap variation is observed in To plot the curve, the data were processed in the origin Sn Zn Co O, Sn Zn Co O, and 0.94 0.05 0.01 2 0.92 0.05 0.03 2 software, in which Eq. (1) might be displayed as, Sn Zn Co O nanoparticles synthesized by the 0.90 0.05 0.05 2 chemical co-precipitation method. The estimated par- col(E)=(1 − col(D)) ∕(2 ∗ col(D)) (2) ticle size and optical band gap of Sn Zn Co O , 0.94 0.05 0.01 2 where col(E) and col(D) are F(R) and R, respectively. How- Sn Zn Co O , and Sn Zn Co O nanopar- 0.92 0.05 0.03 2 0.90 0.05 0.05 2 ever, Eq. (2) was miswritten as, ticles are 16.51, 11.75, and 6.6 nm and 4.00, 3.90, and 3.92 eV, respectively. A blue shift is noticed for all sam- ples as compared to band gap value (3.6 eV) for bulk The online version of the original article can be found under SnO . Increasing Co content results in decreased particle doi:10.1007/s10854-016-5364-x. size, narrowed band gap in the main, and enhanced emis-
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 26, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.