Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application

Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application Precision Agric (2010) 11:586 DOI 10.1007/s11119-010-9171-8 ERRATUM Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application D. K. Giles D. Downey Published online: 7 May 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Erratum to: Precision Agric (2003) 4:103–124 DOI: 10.1023/A:1021871207195 Recent re-evaluation of the original work published in 2003 found that theoretical droplet size diameters were reported incorrectly. In all cases reported in the original work, the theoretical droplet diameters were under-reported by 17.5%. The error in theoretical droplet diameter resulted in an incorrect estimate for spread factor (reported as 0.392 in the original work). The correct spread factor, based on the ratio of the ‘‘correct’’ theoretical droplet diameter to the measured stain diameter is 0.474. In all cases, the droplet size distributions were actually 17.2% higher than what was originally reported. It should be noted that the conclusions from the original work are unchanged, viz., blended-pulse control during large-scale spray applications provides a wider dynamic range and better control for maintaining consistency of spray deposition. Results presented in the original work showed that droplet size changes for mitigation of spray drift were possible while sensing weather conditions and potentially hazardous sprayer locations. Additionally, use of on-board GPS and environmental data collection equipment for mapping application parameters and environmental conditions can assist applicators in providing efficacious and safe applications while also providing documentation of the application for regulatory compliance. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1023/A:1021871207195. D. K. Giles  D. Downey (&) Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California—Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA e-mail: ddowney@ucdavis.edu http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application

Free
1 page
Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/erratum-to-quality-control-verification-and-mapping-for-chemical-T0cWQRrJiq
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11119-010-9171-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Precision Agric (2010) 11:586 DOI 10.1007/s11119-010-9171-8 ERRATUM Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application D. K. Giles D. Downey Published online: 7 May 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Erratum to: Precision Agric (2003) 4:103–124 DOI: 10.1023/A:1021871207195 Recent re-evaluation of the original work published in 2003 found that theoretical droplet size diameters were reported incorrectly. In all cases reported in the original work, the theoretical droplet diameters were under-reported by 17.5%. The error in theoretical droplet diameter resulted in an incorrect estimate for spread factor (reported as 0.392 in the original work). The correct spread factor, based on the ratio of the ‘‘correct’’ theoretical droplet diameter to the measured stain diameter is 0.474. In all cases, the droplet size distributions were actually 17.2% higher than what was originally reported. It should be noted that the conclusions from the original work are unchanged, viz., blended-pulse control during large-scale spray applications provides a wider dynamic range and better control for maintaining consistency of spray deposition. Results presented in the original work showed that droplet size changes for mitigation of spray drift were possible while sensing weather conditions and potentially hazardous sprayer locations. Additionally, use of on-board GPS and environmental data collection equipment for mapping application parameters and environmental conditions can assist applicators in providing efficacious and safe applications while also providing documentation of the application for regulatory compliance. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1023/A:1021871207195. D. K. Giles  D. Downey (&) Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California—Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA e-mail: ddowney@ucdavis.edu

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: May 7, 2010

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off