Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application

Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application Precision Agric (2010) 11:586 DOI 10.1007/s11119-010-9171-8 ERRATUM Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application D. K. Giles D. Downey Published online: 7 May 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Erratum to: Precision Agric (2003) 4:103–124 DOI: 10.1023/A:1021871207195 Recent re-evaluation of the original work published in 2003 found that theoretical droplet size diameters were reported incorrectly. In all cases reported in the original work, the theoretical droplet diameters were under-reported by 17.5%. The error in theoretical droplet diameter resulted in an incorrect estimate for spread factor (reported as 0.392 in the original work). The correct spread factor, based on the ratio of the ‘‘correct’’ theoretical droplet diameter to the measured stain diameter is 0.474. In all cases, the droplet size distributions were actually 17.2% higher than what was originally reported. It should be noted that the conclusions from the original work are unchanged, viz., blended-pulse control during large-scale spray applications provides a wider dynamic range and better control for maintaining consistency of spray deposition. Results presented in the original work showed that droplet size changes for mitigation of spray drift were possible while sensing weather conditions and potentially hazardous sprayer locations. Additionally, use of on-board GPS and environmental data collection equipment for mapping application parameters and environmental conditions can assist applicators in providing efficacious and safe applications while also providing documentation of the application for regulatory compliance. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1023/A:1021871207195. D. K. Giles  D. Downey (&) Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California—Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA e-mail: ddowney@ucdavis.edu http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application

Free
1 page
Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/erratum-to-quality-control-verification-and-mapping-for-chemical-T0cWQRrJiq
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11119-010-9171-8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Precision Agric (2010) 11:586 DOI 10.1007/s11119-010-9171-8 ERRATUM Erratum to: Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application D. K. Giles D. Downey Published online: 7 May 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Erratum to: Precision Agric (2003) 4:103–124 DOI: 10.1023/A:1021871207195 Recent re-evaluation of the original work published in 2003 found that theoretical droplet size diameters were reported incorrectly. In all cases reported in the original work, the theoretical droplet diameters were under-reported by 17.5%. The error in theoretical droplet diameter resulted in an incorrect estimate for spread factor (reported as 0.392 in the original work). The correct spread factor, based on the ratio of the ‘‘correct’’ theoretical droplet diameter to the measured stain diameter is 0.474. In all cases, the droplet size distributions were actually 17.2% higher than what was originally reported. It should be noted that the conclusions from the original work are unchanged, viz., blended-pulse control during large-scale spray applications provides a wider dynamic range and better control for maintaining consistency of spray deposition. Results presented in the original work showed that droplet size changes for mitigation of spray drift were possible while sensing weather conditions and potentially hazardous sprayer locations. Additionally, use of on-board GPS and environmental data collection equipment for mapping application parameters and environmental conditions can assist applicators in providing efficacious and safe applications while also providing documentation of the application for regulatory compliance. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1023/A:1021871207195. D. K. Giles  D. Downey (&) Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California—Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA e-mail: ddowney@ucdavis.edu

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: May 7, 2010

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off