Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators

Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators Positivity (2016) 20:755 DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0376-y Positivity ERRATUM Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators 1 1 1 Yang Deng · Zili Chen · Niushan Gao Published online: 14 October 2015 © Springer Basel 2015 Erratum to: Positivity DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0354-4 We acknowledge that some results of our original article have been proved earlier in [1,2] by Elbour et al. The first one is Theorem 2.8 of the original paper, which is exactly [1, Theo- rem 2.11]. But we provide a different way to prove “(iib) ⇒ (i)” of Theorem 2.8 of the original paper. The next one is Theorem 3.3 of the original paper, a few lines can prove it is exactly [1, Theorem 2.7]. Also, we introduce the theorem in a different way. At last, Theorem 2.1 and part of Theorem 2.6 of the original paper are contained in [2, Theorem 2.7] and [2, Corollary 2.11], respectively. We feel sorry about that we ignored [1,2]. References 1. Elbour, A., Machrafi, N., Moussa, M.: On the class of weak almost limited operators (2014) (preprint). arXiv:1403.0136 2. Machrafi, N., Elbour, A., Fahri, E., Bouras, K.: On the positive weak almost limited operators. Arab J. Math. Sci. 21(2), 136–143 (2015). ISSN http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Positivity Springer Journals

Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators

Positivity , Volume 20 (3) – Oct 14, 2015

Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators

Abstract

Positivity (2016) 20:755 DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0376-y Positivity ERRATUM Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators 1 1 1 Yang Deng · Zili Chen · Niushan Gao Published online: 14 October 2015 © Springer Basel 2015 Erratum to: Positivity DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0354-4 We acknowledge that some results of our original article have been proved earlier in [1,2] by Elbour et al. The first one is Theorem 2.8 of the original paper, which is exactly...
Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/springer_journal/erratum-to-on-positive-almost-weak-dunford-pettis-operators-YX10fHGPU2

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer Basel
Subject
Mathematics; Fourier Analysis; Operator Theory; Potential Theory; Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization; Econometrics
ISSN
1385-1292
eISSN
1572-9281
DOI
10.1007/s11117-015-0376-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Positivity (2016) 20:755 DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0376-y Positivity ERRATUM Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators 1 1 1 Yang Deng · Zili Chen · Niushan Gao Published online: 14 October 2015 © Springer Basel 2015 Erratum to: Positivity DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0354-4 We acknowledge that some results of our original article have been proved earlier in [1,2] by Elbour et al. The first one is Theorem 2.8 of the original paper, which is exactly [1, Theo- rem 2.11]. But we provide a different way to prove “(iib) ⇒ (i)” of Theorem 2.8 of the original paper. The next one is Theorem 3.3 of the original paper, a few lines can prove it is exactly [1, Theorem 2.7]. Also, we introduce the theorem in a different way. At last, Theorem 2.1 and part of Theorem 2.6 of the original paper are contained in [2, Theorem 2.7] and [2, Corollary 2.11], respectively. We feel sorry about that we ignored [1,2]. References 1. Elbour, A., Machrafi, N., Moussa, M.: On the class of weak almost limited operators (2014) (preprint). arXiv:1403.0136 2. Machrafi, N., Elbour, A., Fahri, E., Bouras, K.: On the positive weak almost limited operators. Arab J. Math. Sci. 21(2), 136–143 (2015). ISSN

Journal

PositivitySpringer Journals

Published: Oct 14, 2015

There are no references for this article.