Read Writ (2016) 29:1699 DOI 10.1007/s11145-016-9679-z ERRATUM Erratum to: Improving vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science controversies 1 1 2 • • • Marc Stadtler Lisa Scharrer Monica Macedo-Rouet 3 1 Jean-Franc¸ois Rouet Rainer Bromme Published online: 26 August 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Erratum to: Read Writ (2016) 29:705–729 DOI 10.1007/s11145-016-9623-2 The above-named paper, which is part of the Special Issue on ‘‘Sourcing in the reading process’’, was published prematurely in Read Writ (2016) 29:705–729. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9623-2. & Marc Stadtler firstname.lastname@example.org Lisa Scharrer email@example.com Monica Macedo-Rouet firstname.lastname@example.org Jean-Franc¸ois Rouet email@example.com Rainer Bromme firstname.lastname@example.org Department of Psychology, University of Muenster, Fliednerstrasse 21, 48149 Muenster, Germany University Paris 8, Saint-Denis, France Universite´ de Poitiers and CNRS, Poitiers, France
Reading and Writing – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 26, 2016
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud