Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Hoffer, John Shammas, G. Savini, Jinhai Huang (2016)
Multicenter study of optical low‐coherence interferometry and partial‐coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and ChinaJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42
P. Mandal, Emma Berrow, S. Naroo, J. Wolffsohn, D. Uthoff, D. Holland, Sunil Shah (2013)
Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometerBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 98
O. Findl (2005)
Biometry and intraocular lens power calculationCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology, 16
P. Aristodemou, N. Cartwright, J. Sparrow, R. Johnston (2011)
Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometryJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 37
LT Chylack, JK Wolfe, DM Singer, MC Leske, MA Bullimore, IL Bailey (1993)
The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study GroupArch Ophthalmol, 111
T. Rabsilber, Charlotte Jepsen, G. Auffarth, M. Holzer (2010)
Intraocular lens power calculation: Clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devicesJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 36
L. Chylack, J. Wolfe, D. Singer, M. Leske, M. Bullimore, I. Bailey, J. Friend, D. Mccarthy, Suh‐Yuh Wu (1993)
The Lens Opacities Classification System IIIArchives of Ophthalmology, 111
W. Haigis, B. Lege, Nicole Miller, Britta Schneider (2000)
Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to HaigisGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 238
Jun-hua Li, Hao Chen, G. Savini, Weicong Lu, Xinxin Yu, F. Bao, Qin-Mei Wang, Jinhai Huang (2016)
Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low‐coherence reflectometryJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42
G. Kaswin, A. Rousseau, M. Mgarrech, E. Barreau, M. Labetoulle (2014)
Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: Comparison with the gold standardJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 40
C. McAlinden, Jyoti Khadka, K. Pesudovs (2011)
Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmologyOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31
Jinhai Huang, G. Savini, Fan Wu, Xinxin Yu, Jing Yang, A. Yu, Ye Yu, Qin-Mei Wang (2015)
Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low‐coherence interferometerJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 41
S. Srivannaboon, Chareenun Chirapapaisan, Pratuangsri Chonpimai, Siriwan Loket (2015)
Clinical comparison of a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer and a time‐domain optical coherence tomography–based optical biometerJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 41
T. Olsen (1992)
Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculationJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 18
F. Sabatino, O. Findl, V. Maurino (2016)
Comparative analysis of optical biometersJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42
M. Kurian, Nikhil Negalur, Sudeep Das, Narendra Puttaiah, D. Haria, T. J., Maithil Thakkar (2016)
Biometry with a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low‐coherence reflectometry deviceJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42
A. Akman, L. Asena, S. Güngör (2015)
Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 100
D. Sanders, J. Retzlaff, M. Kraff, H. Gimbel, M. Raanan (1990)
Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulasJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 16
Y. Eom, S. Kang, J. Song, Yong Kim, Hyo Kim (2014)
Comparison of Hoffer Q and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation according to the anterior chamber depth in short eyes.American journal of ophthalmology, 157 4
Purpose To compare and evaluate the agreement between the measurements obtained with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biometer, the IOLMaster® 700 (IOLM), and those obtained by an optical biometer based on optical low-coherence interferometry (OLCI), the Aladdin (ALD); To evaluate the ability to perform biometric measurements in those eyes with transparency alterations. Methods Fifty-five eyes of 55 subjects were included in this study. Axial length (AL), corneal power (K, in diopters) and its astigmatism, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and lens thickness (LT) measures were obtained within both biometers, Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and Topcon Aladdin. Results were analyzed and compared using the Student’s paired samples t-test, Bland–Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Mean age was 73.12 ± 2.63 (62–89 years). The IOLM mean AL, K, and LT values did not show a statistically significant difference from ALD values and showed excellent agreement and correlation (ICC = 1.000, 0.970, 0.952). IOLM measured a lower mean ACD (−0.036 mm) and higher CCT measurements (9.296 μm). Those results were statistically different (p <0.001 in both cases) but showed an excellent correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.994, 0.938). IOLM was able to obtain measures from all the eyes
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.