Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Crawley, A. Sinha, M. Samimy (2015)
Near-Field and Acoustic Far-Field Response of a High-Speed Jet to ExcitationAIAA Journal, 53
R. Drubka, H. Nagib (1981)
Instabilities in Near Field of Turbulent Jets and Their Dependence on Initial Conditions and Reynolds Number
G. Raman, R. Taghavi (1997)
Coupling of twin rectangular supersonic jetsJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 354
K. Zaman, A. Hussain (1980)
Turbulence suppression in free shear flows by controlled excitationJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 103
J. Seiner, J. Manning, M. Ponton (1986)
Dynamic pressure loads associated with twin supersonic plume resonanceAIAA Journal, 26
V. Kibens (1979)
Discrete noise spectrum generated by an acoustically excited jet
Richard Bozak, B. Henderson (2013)
Aeroacoustic Experiments with Twin Jets
M. Kearney-Fischer, Jin-Hwa Kim, M. Samimy (2011)
A study of Mach wave radiation using active controlJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 681
(2016)
Effects of excitation frequency and azimuthal mode on the flow, pressure, and acoustic fields of supersonic jets
K. Yugulis, S. Hansford, J. Gregory, M. Samimy (2013)
Control of High Subsonic Cavity Flow Using Plasma ActuatorsAIAA Journal, 52
Chih-Ming Ho, P. Huerre (1984)
Perturbed Free Shear LayersAnnual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 16
G. Horvay, H. Nagamatsu (1970)
Supersonic jet noise
H. Fuchs, U. Michel (1978)
Experimental Evidence of Turbulent Source Coherence Affecting Jet NoiseAIAA Journal, 16
D. Gaitonde, M. Samimy (2011)
Coherent structures in plasma-actuator controlled supersonic jets: Axisymmetric and mixed azimuthal modesPhysics of Fluids, 23
Ching-Wen Kuo, Yongle Du, D. Mclaughlin, P. Morris (2012)
Experimental and Computational Study of Near Field/Far Field Correlations in Supersonic Jet Noise
S. Crow, F. Champagne (1971)
Orderly structure in jet turbulenceJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 48
M. Samimy, M. Kearney-Fischer, Jin-Hwa Kim, A. Sinha (2012)
High-Speed and High-Reynolds-Number Jet Control Using Localized Arc Filament Plasma ActuatorsJournal of Propulsion and Power, 28
A. Sinha, H. Alkandry, M. Kearney-Fischer, M. Samimy (2012)
The Impulse Response of a High-Speed Jet Forced with Localized Arc Filament Plasma Actuators
Ching-Wen Kuo, J. Veltin, D. Mclaughlin (2010)
Effects of Jet Noise Source Distribution on Acoustic Far-Field MeasurementsInternational Journal of Aeroacoustics, 11
F. Chambers, V. Goldschmidt (1981)
Acoustic Interaction with a Turbulent Plane Jet: Effects on Mean FlowAIAA Journal, 20
G. Brown, A. Roshko (1974)
On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layersJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 64
G. Raman, David Cornelius (1995)
Jet mixing control using excitation from miniature oscillating jetsAIAA Journal, 33
Chih-Ming Ho, F. Hsiao (1983)
Evolution of Coherent Structures in a Lip Jet
N. Webb, M. Samimy (2016)
Control of a Non-Resonating Supersonic Cavity Using Plasma Actuators
Y. Utkin, S. Keshav, Jin-Hwa Kim, J. Kastner, I. Adamovich, M. Samimy (2007)
Development and use of localized arc filament plasma actuators for high-speed flow controlJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 40
D. Mclaughlin, G. Morrison, T. Troutt (1975)
Experiments on the instability waves in a supersonic jet and their acoustic radiationJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 69
C. Hahn (2011)
Design and Validation of the New Jet Facility and Anechoic Chamber
C. Bogey, O. Marsden, C. Bailly (2012)
Influence of initial turbulence level on the flow and sound fields of a subsonic jet at a diameter-based Reynolds number of 105Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 701
C. Tam, D. Burton (1984)
Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flows. Part 2. Axisymmetric jetsJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 138
M. Crawley, Ching-Wen Kuo, M. Samimy (2016)
Vortex Dynamics and Sound Emission in an Excited High-Speed Jet
Jin-Hwa Kim, M. Samimy (2008)
Effects of Active Control on the Flow Structure in a High Reynolds Number Supersonic JetInternational Journal of Flow Control, 1
C-M Ho, F-B Hsiao (1983)
Structure of Complex Turbulent Shear Layers
C. Moore (1977)
The role of shear-layer instability waves in jet exhaust noiseJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 80
K Zaman (1985)
Effect of initial condition on subsonic jet noiseAIAA J, 23
Jin-Hwa Kim, Y. Utkin, I. Adamovich, M. Samimy (2005)
Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuatorsJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 578
J. Cohen, I. Wygnanski (1987)
The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzleJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 176
N. Webb, C. Clifford, M. Samimy (2013)
Control of oblique shock wave/boundary layer interactions using plasma actuatorsExperiments in Fluids, 54
Ching-Wen Kuo, J. Cluts, M. Samimy (2017)
Exploring Physics and Control of Twin Supersonic Circular JetsAIAA Journal, 55
M. Kearney-Fischer, Jin-Hwa Kim, M. Samimy (2009)
Control of a high Reynolds number Mach 0.9 heated jet using plasma actuatorsPhysics of Fluids, 21
P. Plaschko (1979)
Helical instabilities of slowly divergent jetsJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 92
K. Zaman (1985)
Effect of Initial Condition on Subsonic Jet Noise from Two Rectangular Nozzles
It has been widely reported in the literature that the jet preferred mode Strouhal number varies over a large range of 0.2–0.6, depending upon the facility where the measurement is made as well as the measurement techniques and the location in the jet plume where the measurement is taken. This study investigates this wide variation and potential explanations for it. Active flow control is used to show that the jet is receptive to excitation over a large range of Strouhal numbers and azimuthal modes. The wide variation in the preferred mode Strouhal number is shown to be tightly linked to the evolution, spacing, and scale of the coherent flow structures, which dominate the jet shear layer’s development. The low-end of the range is determined by the minimum Strouhal number at which structures begin to interact with one another in the jet plume. Below this range, structures have no significant effect on the plume’s statistical properties. For Strouhal numbers at the high-end of the range, the development of coherent flow structures shifts upstream toward the nozzle exit and the structures disintegrate earlier in the jet plume. The earlier development and disintegration prevent these structures from strongly impacting the entire flowfield. The results imply that upstream perturbations in the flow present in various facilities could be responsible for the variations in the measured jet preferred mode Strouhal number. Experimental results from schlieren imaging and near- and far-field microphone measurements are used to investigate the preferred mode Strouhal number across this range.
Experiments in Fluids – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 27, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.