Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Effects of distributional information on categorization of prosodic contours

Effects of distributional information on categorization of prosodic contours Although prosody clearly affects the interpretation of utterances, the mapping between prosodic representations and acoustic features is highly variable. Listeners may in part cope with this variability by adapting to distributions of acoustic features in the input. We examined whether listeners adapt to distributional changes using the construction It looks like an X. When pronounced with an H* pitch accent on the final noun and a low boundary tone, the construction supports an affirmative interpretation (e.g., It looks like a ZEBRA [and I think it is one]). Conversely, when pronounced with a L+H* pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, it suggests a negative interpretation (e.g., It LOOKS like a zebra.... [but it is not]). Experiment 1 elicited pragmatic interpretations of resynthesized 12-step continua with these two contours as the end points. In Experiment 2, one group of listeners heard items sampled from the most ambiguous region along the continua followed by affirmative continuations (e.g., It looks like a zebra because it has stripes all over its body) and items near the contrastive endpoint followed by negative continuations (e.g., It looks like a zebra but it is actually something else). Another group heard the reverse (i.e., ambiguous items with negative continuations and non-contrastive items with affirmative continuations). The two groups of participants subsequently derived diverging interpretations for novel ambiguous items, suggesting that prosodic processing involves flexible mappings between acoustic features and prosodic representations that are meaningful in interpretation of speech. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Springer Journals

Effects of distributional information on categorization of prosodic contours

Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/effects-of-distributional-information-on-categorization-of-prosodic-dcSn8BcUUz
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Subject
Psychology; Cognitive Psychology
ISSN
1069-9384
eISSN
1531-5320
DOI
10.3758/s13423-017-1332-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Although prosody clearly affects the interpretation of utterances, the mapping between prosodic representations and acoustic features is highly variable. Listeners may in part cope with this variability by adapting to distributions of acoustic features in the input. We examined whether listeners adapt to distributional changes using the construction It looks like an X. When pronounced with an H* pitch accent on the final noun and a low boundary tone, the construction supports an affirmative interpretation (e.g., It looks like a ZEBRA [and I think it is one]). Conversely, when pronounced with a L+H* pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, it suggests a negative interpretation (e.g., It LOOKS like a zebra.... [but it is not]). Experiment 1 elicited pragmatic interpretations of resynthesized 12-step continua with these two contours as the end points. In Experiment 2, one group of listeners heard items sampled from the most ambiguous region along the continua followed by affirmative continuations (e.g., It looks like a zebra because it has stripes all over its body) and items near the contrastive endpoint followed by negative continuations (e.g., It looks like a zebra but it is actually something else). Another group heard the reverse (i.e., ambiguous items with negative continuations and non-contrastive items with affirmative continuations). The two groups of participants subsequently derived diverging interpretations for novel ambiguous items, suggesting that prosodic processing involves flexible mappings between acoustic features and prosodic representations that are meaningful in interpretation of speech.

Journal

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 7, 2017

References

  • Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English
    Arvaniti, A; Garding, G
  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, DJ; Levy, R; Scheepers, C; Tily, HJ
  • On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents
    Büring, D
  • Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues
    Clayards, M; Tanenhaus, MK; Aslin, RN; Jacobs, RA
  • Prosody and language comprehension
    Dahan, D
  • Pitch range variation in English tonal contrasts: Continuous or categorical?
    Dilley, LC
  • Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives listeners’ comprehension
    Isaacs, A; Watson, D
  • Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel
    Kleinschmidt, DF; Jaeger, TF
  • Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers
    Kraljic, T; Samuel, AG
  • Is it or isn’t it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings
    Kurumada, C; Brown, M; Bibyk, S; Pontillo, DF; Tanenhaus, MK
  • The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical?
    Ladd, DR; Morton, R
  • Perception of the speech code
    Liberman, AM; Cooper, FS; Shankweiler, DP; Studdert-Kennedy, M
  • Language Sound Structure
    Liberman, M; Pierrehumbert, J
  • Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels
    Liu, R; Holt, LL
  • The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent
    Maye, J; Aslin, RN; Tanenhaus, MK
  • Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones
    Moulines, E; Charpentier, F
  • Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition
    Norris, D; McQueen, JM; Cutler, A
  • Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  • The intonational disambiguation of indirect speech acts
    Sag, IA; Liberman, M
  • Inter-transcriber reliability of ToBI prosodic labeling
    Syrdal, AK; McGory, J
  • Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt model
    Taylor, P
  • Interpreting pitch accents in online comprehension: H* vs. L+H*
    Watson, DG; Tanenhaus, MK; Gunlogson, CA