Dynamic Robust Duality in Utility Maximization

Dynamic Robust Duality in Utility Maximization A celebrated financial application of convex duality theory gives an explicit relation between the following two quantities: (i) The optimal terminal wealth $$X^*(T) : = X_{\varphi ^*}(T)$$ X ∗ ( T ) : = X φ ∗ ( T ) of the problem to maximize the expected U-utility of the terminal wealth $$X_{\varphi }(T)$$ X φ ( T ) generated by admissible portfolios $$\varphi (t); 0 \le t \le T$$ φ ( t ) ; 0 ≤ t ≤ T in a market with the risky asset price process modeled as a semimartingale; (ii) The optimal scenario $$\frac{dQ^*}{dP}$$ d Q ∗ d P of the dual problem to minimize the expected V-value of $$\frac{dQ}{dP}$$ d Q d P over a family of equivalent local martingale measures Q, where V is the convex conjugate function of the concave function U. In this paper we consider markets modeled by Itô-Lévy processes. In the first part we use the maximum principle in stochastic control theory to extend the above relation to a dynamic relation, valid for all $$t \in [0,T]$$ t ∈ [ 0 , T ] . We prove in particular that the optimal adjoint process for the primal problem coincides with the optimal density process, and that the optimal adjoint process for the dual problem coincides with the optimal wealth process; $$0 \le t \le T$$ 0 ≤ t ≤ T . In the terminal time case $$t=T$$ t = T we recover the classical duality connection above. We get moreover an explicit relation between the optimal portfolio $$\varphi ^*$$ φ ∗ and the optimal measure $$Q^*$$ Q ∗ . We also obtain that the existence of an optimal scenario is equivalent to the replicability of a related T-claim. In the second part we present robust (model uncertainty) versions of the optimization problems in (i) and (ii), and we prove a similar dynamic relation between them. In particular, we show how to get from the solution of one of the problems to the other. We illustrate the results with explicit examples. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Mathematics and Optimization Springer Journals

Dynamic Robust Duality in Utility Maximization

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/dynamic-robust-duality-in-utility-maximization-O0TtpeGc8C
Publisher
Springer US
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Mathematics; Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization; Systems Theory, Control; Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics; Mathematical Methods in Physics; Numerical and Computational Physics, Simulation
ISSN
0095-4616
eISSN
1432-0606
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00245-016-9329-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A celebrated financial application of convex duality theory gives an explicit relation between the following two quantities: (i) The optimal terminal wealth $$X^*(T) : = X_{\varphi ^*}(T)$$ X ∗ ( T ) : = X φ ∗ ( T ) of the problem to maximize the expected U-utility of the terminal wealth $$X_{\varphi }(T)$$ X φ ( T ) generated by admissible portfolios $$\varphi (t); 0 \le t \le T$$ φ ( t ) ; 0 ≤ t ≤ T in a market with the risky asset price process modeled as a semimartingale; (ii) The optimal scenario $$\frac{dQ^*}{dP}$$ d Q ∗ d P of the dual problem to minimize the expected V-value of $$\frac{dQ}{dP}$$ d Q d P over a family of equivalent local martingale measures Q, where V is the convex conjugate function of the concave function U. In this paper we consider markets modeled by Itô-Lévy processes. In the first part we use the maximum principle in stochastic control theory to extend the above relation to a dynamic relation, valid for all $$t \in [0,T]$$ t ∈ [ 0 , T ] . We prove in particular that the optimal adjoint process for the primal problem coincides with the optimal density process, and that the optimal adjoint process for the dual problem coincides with the optimal wealth process; $$0 \le t \le T$$ 0 ≤ t ≤ T . In the terminal time case $$t=T$$ t = T we recover the classical duality connection above. We get moreover an explicit relation between the optimal portfolio $$\varphi ^*$$ φ ∗ and the optimal measure $$Q^*$$ Q ∗ . We also obtain that the existence of an optimal scenario is equivalent to the replicability of a related T-claim. In the second part we present robust (model uncertainty) versions of the optimization problems in (i) and (ii), and we prove a similar dynamic relation between them. In particular, we show how to get from the solution of one of the problems to the other. We illustrate the results with explicit examples.

Journal

Applied Mathematics and OptimizationSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 21, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off