Objectives To evaluate the concordance between DECT perfusion and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Methods Eighty patients underwent V/Q scintigraphy and DECT perfusion on a 2nd- and 3rd-generation dual-source CTsystem. The imaging criteria for diagnosing CTEPH relied on at least one segmental triangular perfusion defect on DECT perfusion studies and V/Q mismatch on scintigraphy examinations. Results Based on multidisciplinary expert decisions that did not include DECT perfusion, 36 patients were diagnosed with CTEPH and 44 patients with other aetiologies of PH. On DECT perfusion studies, there were 35 true positives, 6 false positives and 1 false negative (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 0.86, PPV 0.85, NPV 0.97). On V/Q scans, there were 35 true positives and 1 false negative (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 1, PPV 1, NPV 0.98). There was excellent agreement between CT perfusion and scintigraphy in diagnosing CTEPH (kappa value 0.80). Combined information from DECT perfusion and CT angiographic images enabled correct reclassification of the 6 false positives and the unique false negative case of DECT perfusion. Conclusion There is excellent agreement between DECT perfusion and V/Q scintigraphy in diagnosing CTEPH. The diagnostic accuracy of DECT perfusion is reinforced by the morpho-functional analysis of data
European Radiology – Springer Journals
Published: May 30, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud