Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
KQ Hill, PA Hurley (1984)
Estimating congressional district political attributes with survey data: A reliability assessmentPolitical Methodology, 10
RJ Dalton (2008)
Direct democracy’s impact on American political institutions
JR Hibbing, E Theiss-Morse (2002)
Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work
MXD Carpini, S Keeter (1993)
Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things firstAmerican Journal of Political Science, 37
S Bowler, T Donovan (2004)
Measuring the effect of direct democracy on state policy: Not all initiatives are created equalState Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4
L Blume, J Müller, S Voigt (2009)
The economic effects of direct democracy: A first global assessmentPublic Choice, 140
FJ Boehmke, D Bowen (2010)
Direct democracy and individual interest group membershipJournal of Politics, 72
M Prior (2005)
News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnoutAmerican Journal of Political Science, 49
BE Keith, DB Magleby, CJ Nelson, E Orr, MC Westlye, RE Wolfinger (1992)
The myth of the independent voter
MA Smith (2002)
Ballot initiatives and the democratic citizenJournal of Politics, 64
DH Weaver (1996)
What voters learn from mediaAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546
Joshua J Dyck (2009)
Initiated distrust: Direct democracy and trust in governmentAmerican Politics Research, 37
DL Biggers (2012)
Can a social issue proposition increase political knowledge? Campaign learning and the educative effects of direct democracyAmerican Politics Research, 40
J Beattie, J Baron, JC Hershey, MD Spranca, D Mark (1994)
Psychological determinants of decision attitudeJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7
J Jerit, J Barabas, T Bolsen (2006)
Citizens, knowledge, and the information environmentAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
JG Matsusaka (2005)
Direct democracy worksThe Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19
S Bowler, T Donovan (2002)
Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on governmentBritish Journal of Political Science, 32
RP Branton (2003)
Examining individual-level voting behavior on state ballot propositionsPolitical Research Quarterly, 56
SW Raudenbush, AS Bryk (2002)
Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
JJ Dyck, NR Seabrook (2010)
Mobilized by direct democracy: Short-term versus long-term effects and the geography of turnout in ballot measure electionsSocial Science Quarterly, 91
S Botti, SS Iyengar (2006)
The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfareJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25
TM Carsey, GC Wright (1998)
State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial electionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 42
SP Nicholson (2003)
The political environment and ballot proposition awarenessAmerican Journal of Political Science, 47
L Biggers (2011)
When ballot issues matter: social issue ballot measures and their impact on turnoutPolitical Behavior, 33
D Dorn, JAV Fischer, G Kirchgässner, A Sousa-Poza (2007)
Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: New evidence for SwitzerlandJournal of Happiness Studies, 9
DG Mick, SM Broniarczyk, J Haidt (2004)
Choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose, choose: Emerging and prospective research on the deleterious effects of living in consumer hyperchoiceJournal of Business Ethics, 52
MXD Carpini, S Keeter (1996)
What Americans know about politics and why it matters
LT Lac, EL Lascher (2012)
The impact of direct democracy on governance: A replication and extensionCalifornia Journal of Politics and Policy, 5
Daniel Schlozman, Ian Yohai (2008)
How initiatives don’t always make citizens: Ballot initiatives in the American states, 1978–2004Political Behavior, 30
P Brace, K Sims-Butler, K Arceneaux, M Johnson (2002)
Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey dataAmerican Journal of Political Science, 46
BS Frey, A Stutzer (2000)
Happiness prospers in democracyJournal of Happiness Studies, 1
A Lupia (1994)
Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform electionsAmerican Political Science Review, 88
PF Nardulli (1990)
Political subcultures in the American states: An empirical examination of Elazar’s formulationAmerican Politics Research, 18
RE Hero, CJ Tolbert (1996)
A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the USAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
I Sharkansky (1969)
The utility of Elazar’s political culture: A research notePolity, 2
PE Converse (1964)
Ideology and discontent
JR Zaller (1992)
The nature and origins of mass opinion
RE Hero, CJ Tolbert (2004)
Minority voices and citizen attitudes about government responsiveness in the American states: Do social and institutional context matter?British Journal of Political Science, 34
RC Luskin (1990)
Explaining political sophisticationPolitical Behavior, 12
SS Iyengar, MR Lepper (2000)
When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79
T Donovan, CJ Tolbert, DA Smith (2008)
Priming presidential votes by direct democracyJournal of Politics, 70
JR Lax, J Phillips (2009)
How should we estimate public opinion in the states?American Journal of Political Science, 53
B Scheibehenne, R Greifeneder, PM Todd (2010)
Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overloadJournal of Consumer Research, 37
DA Smith, CJ Tolbert (2004)
Educated by initiative: The effects of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states
RS Erikson, GC Wright, JP McIver (1993)
Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states
B Schwartz (2004)
The paradox of choice: Why more is less
BS Frey, A Stutzer (2000)
Happiness, economy, and institutionsEconomic Journal, 110
JJ Dyck, EL Lascher (2009)
Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsideredPolitical Behavior, 31
SH Chaffee, SF Kanihan (1997)
Learning about politics from the mass mediaPolitical Communication, 14
JE Campbell (1986)
Presidential coattails and midterm losses in state legislative electionsThe American Political Science Review, 80
JH Kuklinski, PJ Quirk, J Jerit, RF Rich (2001)
The political environment and citizen competenceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 45
M Freitag, I Stadelmann-Stefan (2010)
Stumbling block or stepping stone? The influence of direct democracy on individual participation in parliamentary electionsElectoral Studies, 29
EE Schattschneider (1960)
The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America
P Selb (2008)
Supersized votes: Ballot length, uncertainty, and choice in direct legislation electionsPublic Choice, 135
M Childers, M Binder (2012)
Engaged by the initiative? How the use of citizen initiatives increases voter turnoutPolitical Research Quarterly, 65
S Bowler, T Donovan (1998)
Demanding choices: Opinion, voting and direct democracy
DE Campbell, JQ Monson (2008)
The religion card. Gay marriage and the 2004 Presidential ElectionPublic Opinion Quarterly, 66
M Prior, A Lupia (2008)
Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skillsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 51
RC Luskin (1987)
Measuring political sophisticationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 31
Current literature often suggests that more information and choices will enhance citizens’ general political knowledge. Notably, some studies indicate that a greater number of state ballot initiatives raise Americans’ knowledge through increases in motivation and supply of political information. By contrast, we contend that political psychology theory and findings indicate that, at best, more ballot measures will have no effect on knowledge. At worst greater use of direct democracy should make it more costly to learn about institutions of representative government and lessen motivation by overwhelming voters with choices. To test this proposition, we develop a new research design and draw upon data more appropriate to assessing the question at hand. We also make use of a propensity score matching algorithm to assess the balance in the data between initiative state and non-initiative state voters. Controlling for a wide variety of variables, we find that there is no empirical relationship between ballot initiatives and political knowledge. These results add to a growing list of findings which cast serious doubt on the educative potential of direct democracy.
Political Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 26, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.