Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A Mattoo, A Subramanian (2012)
Equity in climate change: an analytical reviewWorld Dev, 40
Renaud Gignac, H. Matthews (2015)
Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countriesEnvironmental Research Letters, 10
T. Kanitkar, T. Jayaraman, Mario D'Souza, P. Purkayastha (2013)
Carbon budgets for climate change mitigation – a GAMS-based emissions model
H. Matthews, N. Gillett, P. Stott, K. Zickfeld (2009)
The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissionsNature, 459
Christian Holz, S. Kartha, T. Athanasiou (2017)
Fairly sharing 1.5: national fair shares of a 1.5 °C-compliant global mitigation effortInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18
E Neumayer (2000)
In defence of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissionsEcol Econ, 33
(2008)
The greenhouse development rights framework 2nd edi., Berlin: Published by the Heinrich Böll Foundation, Christian Aid, EcoEquity and the Stockholm Environment
José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez, Jordi Teixidó-Figueras, Cori Vilella (2016)
The global carbon budget: a conflicting claims problemClimatic Change, 136
L. Greene (2000)
EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 108
Jing Cao (2008)
Reconciling Human Development and Climate Protection : Perspectives from Developing Countries on Post-2012 International Climate Change Policy
K. Zickfeld, Vivek Arora, N. Gillett (2012)
Is the climate response to CO2 emissions path dependent?Geophysical Research Letters, 39
A. Parant (1990)
[World population prospects].Futuribles, 141
D. Vuuren, E. Stehfest, M. Elzen, T. Kram, J. Vliet, Sebastiaan Deetman, M. Isaac, K. Goldewijk, A. Hof, A. Beltran, R. Oostenrijk, B. Ruijven (2011)
RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°CClimatic Change, 109
Tyler Herrington, K. Zickfeld (2014)
Path independence of climate and carbon cycle response over a broad range of cumulative carbon emissionsEarth System Dynamics Discussions, 5
Benito Müller, N. Höhne, C. Ellermann (2009)
Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate changeClimate Policy, 9
M. Raupach, S. Davis, G. Peters, R. Andrew, J. Canadell, P. Ciais, P. Friedlingstein, F. Jotzo, D. Vuuren, Corinne Quéré (2014)
Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissionsNature Climate Change, 4
T. Frölicher, M. Winton, J. Sarmiento (2014)
Continued global warming after CO 2 emissions stoppageNature Climate Change, 4
S. Arrhenius (2017)
“On the Infl uence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground” (1896)The Future of Nature
N. Keohane, A. Petsonk, A. Hanafi (2017)
Toward a club of carbon marketsClimatic Change, 144
A. Mattoo, A. Subramanian (2010)
Equity in Climate Change: An Analytical ReviewEnvironmental Economics eJournal
S. Caney (2009)
Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions1Journal of Global Ethics, 5
E. Neumayer (2000)
In Defence of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas EmissionsAgricultural & Natural Resource Economics
Michele Stua (2017)
From the Paris Agreement to a Low-Carbon Bretton Woods: Rationale for the Establishment of a Mitigation AllianceFrom the Paris Agreement to a Low-Carbon Bretton Woods
Genovaitė Liobikienė, Mindaugas Butkus (2017)
The European Union possibilities to achieve targets of Europe 2020 and Paris agreement climate policyRenewable Energy, 106
T. Kanitkar, T. Jayaraman, Mario D'Souza, M. Sanwal, P. Purkayastha, R. Talwar (2010)
Meeting Equity in a Finite Carbon World Global Carbon Budgets and Burden Sharing in Mitigation Actions
W. Landman (2010)
Climate change 2007: the physical science basisSouth African Geographical Journal, 92
L. Srivastava, I. Rehman (2006)
Energy for sustainable development in India: Linkages and strategic directionEnergy Policy, 34
R. Watson, D. Albritton, T. Barker, IA Baskmakov, O. Canziani, R. Christ, U. Cubasch, O. Davidson, H. Gitay, D. Griggs, K. Halsnaes, J. Houghton, J. House, Z. Kundzewicz, M. Lal, N. Leary, C. Magadza, J. McCarthy, J. Mitchell, J. Moreira, M. Munasinghe, I. Noble, R. Pachauri, B. Pittock, M. Prather, R. Richels, Jb Robinson, J. Sathaye, S. Schneider, R. Scholes, T. Stocker, N. Sundararaman, R. Swart, T. Taniguchi, D. Zhou (2001)
Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report: A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
H. Füssel (2010)
How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive indicator-based assessmentGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 20
B. Shankar, S. Agrawal, A. Beaudreault, Laxmaiah Avula, R. Martorell, S. Osendarp, D. Prabhakaran, M. Mclean (2017)
Dietary and nutritional change in India: implications for strategies, policies, and interventionsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1395
J. Aldy, Robert Stavins (2009)
Post-kyoto International Climate Policy
In this paper, a model for the distribution of the Global Carbon Budget between the countries of the world is presented. The model is based on the criteria of equity while also taking into account the different historical responsibilities. The Global Carbon Budget corresponds to the quantity of carbon dioxide emissions that can still be released into the atmosphere while maintaining the increase in the average earth surface temperature below 2 °C, and it is therefore compatible with the long-term objective defined in the Paris Agreement. The results of applying the model are shown both for the 15 emitters that currently top the ranking for world emissions as well as for the other countries, which are grouped together in three main groups: Other African, Other Latin American and Caribbean, and the Rest of the World. Mitigation curves compatible with the carbon budget allocated to the different countries are presented. When comparing each emitter’s historical emissions for the period 1971–2010 with the proposed distribution for the period 2011–2050 obtained using the model, it can be seen that developed countries must face the future with a greatly reduced carbon budget, whereas developing countries can make use of a carbon budget that is higher than their cumulative historical emissions. Finally, there is a discussion about how a model with these characteristics could be useful when implementing the Paris Agreement.
Climatic Change – Springer Journals
Published: May 28, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.