Distinguishing child abuse fractures from rickets

Distinguishing child abuse fractures from rickets Pediatr Radiol (2018) 48:305–307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4037-0 COMMENTARY Alan E. Oestreich Received: 28 July 2017 /Revised: 6 October 2017 /Accepted: 8 November 2017 /Published online: 24 November 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017 Introduction demonstrate by reviewing the details of these different pat- terns that this is an incorrect declaration. Additionally, con- The keystone of distinguishing suspected child abuse on ra- cavity of the distal ulna metaphysis alone is not a sign of diographs from manifestations of rickets, including healing rickets [3]. Rickets is radiologically distinct from classic rickets, is looking at bones other than that bone suspected of metaphyseal fractures (see also [4]). rickets, as well as carefully perusing the bone under suspicion. Among the claims put forth by denialists is that the appear- Understanding the metaphyseal collar and the zone of provi- ance of healing rickets may be mistaken for a bucket handle sional calcification as part of the normal, non-rachitic, tubular type of classic metaphyseal lesion seen in child abuse [2]. I bone metaphyses should help distinguish between rickets and contend that although there may be a superficial resemblance changes related to fracture. between the two entities, namely that both occur in the metaphyses, no http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Pediatric Radiology Springer Journals

Distinguishing child abuse fractures from rickets

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/distinguishing-child-abuse-fractures-from-rickets-I32h9dXwWm
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Imaging / Radiology; Pediatrics; Neuroradiology; Nuclear Medicine; Ultrasound; Oncology
ISSN
0301-0449
eISSN
1432-1998
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00247-017-4037-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Pediatr Radiol (2018) 48:305–307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4037-0 COMMENTARY Alan E. Oestreich Received: 28 July 2017 /Revised: 6 October 2017 /Accepted: 8 November 2017 /Published online: 24 November 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017 Introduction demonstrate by reviewing the details of these different pat- terns that this is an incorrect declaration. Additionally, con- The keystone of distinguishing suspected child abuse on ra- cavity of the distal ulna metaphysis alone is not a sign of diographs from manifestations of rickets, including healing rickets [3]. Rickets is radiologically distinct from classic rickets, is looking at bones other than that bone suspected of metaphyseal fractures (see also [4]). rickets, as well as carefully perusing the bone under suspicion. Among the claims put forth by denialists is that the appear- Understanding the metaphyseal collar and the zone of provi- ance of healing rickets may be mistaken for a bucket handle sional calcification as part of the normal, non-rachitic, tubular type of classic metaphyseal lesion seen in child abuse [2]. I bone metaphyses should help distinguish between rickets and contend that although there may be a superficial resemblance changes related to fracture. between the two entities, namely that both occur in the metaphyses, no

Journal

Pediatric RadiologySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 24, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off