Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated Subjects

Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated... Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2017) 51:240–246 DOI 10.1007/s13139-016-0460-7 ISSN (print) 1869-3482 ORIGINAL ARTICLE ISSN (online) 1869-3474 Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated Subjects 1 2 3 3 3 Jong-Ryool Oh & Ji-Hyoung Seo & Woo-Jin Chang & Seung-Il Bae & In-Wook Song & 4 4 5 6 3 Jin-Gu Bong & Hye-Yeon Jeong & So-Young Park & Jeongyup Bae & Hyundae Yoon Received: 23 June 2016 /Revised: 26 October 2016 /Accepted: 28 October 2016 /Published online: 21 November 2016 Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2016 Abstract significantly differ between the endoscopy and control groups. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the difference in In contrast, mean SUVmax in the whole stomach was 18 % fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in sedated healthy subjects higher in the endoscopy group than in the control group after they underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (SUVmax: 2.96 vs. 2.51, P = 0.010). In the lower gastrointes- and colonoscopy procedures. tinal track, SUVmax from the cecum to the rectum was not Methods The endoscopy group (n = 29) included healthy sub- significantly different between the two groups, whereas jects who underwent screening via F-18 FDG positron emis- SUVmax in the anus was 20 % http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Springer Journals

Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated Subjects

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/difference-in-f-18-fdg-uptake-after-esophagogastroduodenoscopy-and-PJ00rV0YJS
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Imaging / Radiology; Orthopedics; Cardiology; Oncology
ISSN
1869-3474
eISSN
1869-3482
D.O.I.
10.1007/s13139-016-0460-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2017) 51:240–246 DOI 10.1007/s13139-016-0460-7 ISSN (print) 1869-3482 ORIGINAL ARTICLE ISSN (online) 1869-3474 Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated Subjects 1 2 3 3 3 Jong-Ryool Oh & Ji-Hyoung Seo & Woo-Jin Chang & Seung-Il Bae & In-Wook Song & 4 4 5 6 3 Jin-Gu Bong & Hye-Yeon Jeong & So-Young Park & Jeongyup Bae & Hyundae Yoon Received: 23 June 2016 /Revised: 26 October 2016 /Accepted: 28 October 2016 /Published online: 21 November 2016 Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2016 Abstract significantly differ between the endoscopy and control groups. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the difference in In contrast, mean SUVmax in the whole stomach was 18 % fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in sedated healthy subjects higher in the endoscopy group than in the control group after they underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (SUVmax: 2.96 vs. 2.51, P = 0.010). In the lower gastrointes- and colonoscopy procedures. tinal track, SUVmax from the cecum to the rectum was not Methods The endoscopy group (n = 29) included healthy sub- significantly different between the two groups, whereas jects who underwent screening via F-18 FDG positron emis- SUVmax in the anus was 20 %

Journal

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 21, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off