Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling

Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in... Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), which reliably detects neoplasms in the distal colon and rectum but not in the proximal colon, has been shown to reduce incidence and mortality of distal colorectal cancer (CRC). Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of CRCs and some proportion of adenomas also in the proximal colon. We assessed the expected diagnostic performance of combined application of FS and FIT. We systematically reviewed screening studies conducted in an average risk population that reported specificities and site-specific sensitivities of FITs for detection of CRC or advanced adenoma (AA). Only studies that conducted colonoscopy in all subjects were included. PubMed and Web of Science were searched until May 13, 2016. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Sensitivity of FS was derived from colonoscopy results, assuming the same sensitivity as colonoscopy for left-sided neoplasms and follow-up colonoscopy after detection of distal adenomas. Bivariate meta-analyses were used to derive summary estimates of overall sensitivity and specificity of individual and joint application of both tests. Ten eligible studies were identified. Summary estimates (95% confidence intervals) of overall sensitivity for detecting CRC and AA were 65% (56–74%) and 27% (23–31%) for FIT alone, 67% (58–75%) and 67% (59–75%) for FS alone, and 89% (83–92%) and 75% (68–80%), respectively, for the combination of both tests. The pooled specificity (95% CI) of FIT was 92% (90–95%). Adding a FIT to a once-only screening FS would substantially increase sensitivity of CRC screening at a modest loss in specificity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Epidemiology Springer Journals

Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/diagnostic-performance-of-flexible-sigmoidoscopy-combined-with-fecal-XOiG7a2zE2
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Epidemiology; Public Health; Infectious Diseases; Cardiology; Oncology
ISSN
0393-2990
eISSN
1573-7284
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10654-017-0279-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), which reliably detects neoplasms in the distal colon and rectum but not in the proximal colon, has been shown to reduce incidence and mortality of distal colorectal cancer (CRC). Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of CRCs and some proportion of adenomas also in the proximal colon. We assessed the expected diagnostic performance of combined application of FS and FIT. We systematically reviewed screening studies conducted in an average risk population that reported specificities and site-specific sensitivities of FITs for detection of CRC or advanced adenoma (AA). Only studies that conducted colonoscopy in all subjects were included. PubMed and Web of Science were searched until May 13, 2016. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Sensitivity of FS was derived from colonoscopy results, assuming the same sensitivity as colonoscopy for left-sided neoplasms and follow-up colonoscopy after detection of distal adenomas. Bivariate meta-analyses were used to derive summary estimates of overall sensitivity and specificity of individual and joint application of both tests. Ten eligible studies were identified. Summary estimates (95% confidence intervals) of overall sensitivity for detecting CRC and AA were 65% (56–74%) and 27% (23–31%) for FIT alone, 67% (58–75%) and 67% (59–75%) for FS alone, and 89% (83–92%) and 75% (68–80%), respectively, for the combination of both tests. The pooled specificity (95% CI) of FIT was 92% (90–95%). Adding a FIT to a once-only screening FS would substantially increase sensitivity of CRC screening at a modest loss in specificity.

Journal

European Journal of EpidemiologySpringer Journals

Published: Jun 30, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off