Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics

Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics Considering the increasing frequency of malignant skin lesions in the last decades, appropriate diagnosis of all kinds of skin lesions has become more important than ever. This study compares the type of skin lesions, seen and treated by dermatology and plastic surgery clinics in Marmara University Hospital, the preferred method of diagnosis, and the correlation between the clinical and pathological diagnosis for each clinic. Patient records, for the years 2000 and 2001, were reviewed retrospectively from the archives of the pathology department. Specimens, 495, from the dermatology clinic and 285 specimens from the plastic surgery clinic were reviewed. In the plastic surgery clinic, excisional biopsy was by far the most utilized method (93.7%). In the dermatology clinic, punch biopsy was the most frequently used method (47.9%). In 317 of the 495 dermatology specimens (64%) and in 175 of the 285 plastic surgery specimens (61.4%), the clinical diagnosis correlated with the pathological diagnosis. Statistical comparison of the overall correct diagnosis ratio between the two clinics did not show a significant difference ( p > 0.05). Patient spectrums of the two clinics were different. Benign and malignant neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the plastic surgery clinic. Inflammatory and infectious and benign neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the dermatology clinic. Biopsy methods preferred were also different, but accuracy in clinical diagnosis was comparable. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/diagnostic-accuracy-of-biopsied-skin-lesions-in-dermatology-and-7meVPjqlSr
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-007-0108-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Considering the increasing frequency of malignant skin lesions in the last decades, appropriate diagnosis of all kinds of skin lesions has become more important than ever. This study compares the type of skin lesions, seen and treated by dermatology and plastic surgery clinics in Marmara University Hospital, the preferred method of diagnosis, and the correlation between the clinical and pathological diagnosis for each clinic. Patient records, for the years 2000 and 2001, were reviewed retrospectively from the archives of the pathology department. Specimens, 495, from the dermatology clinic and 285 specimens from the plastic surgery clinic were reviewed. In the plastic surgery clinic, excisional biopsy was by far the most utilized method (93.7%). In the dermatology clinic, punch biopsy was the most frequently used method (47.9%). In 317 of the 495 dermatology specimens (64%) and in 175 of the 285 plastic surgery specimens (61.4%), the clinical diagnosis correlated with the pathological diagnosis. Statistical comparison of the overall correct diagnosis ratio between the two clinics did not show a significant difference ( p > 0.05). Patient spectrums of the two clinics were different. Benign and malignant neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the plastic surgery clinic. Inflammatory and infectious and benign neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the dermatology clinic. Biopsy methods preferred were also different, but accuracy in clinical diagnosis was comparable.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 1, 2007

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off