Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics

Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics Considering the increasing frequency of malignant skin lesions in the last decades, appropriate diagnosis of all kinds of skin lesions has become more important than ever. This study compares the type of skin lesions, seen and treated by dermatology and plastic surgery clinics in Marmara University Hospital, the preferred method of diagnosis, and the correlation between the clinical and pathological diagnosis for each clinic. Patient records, for the years 2000 and 2001, were reviewed retrospectively from the archives of the pathology department. Specimens, 495, from the dermatology clinic and 285 specimens from the plastic surgery clinic were reviewed. In the plastic surgery clinic, excisional biopsy was by far the most utilized method (93.7%). In the dermatology clinic, punch biopsy was the most frequently used method (47.9%). In 317 of the 495 dermatology specimens (64%) and in 175 of the 285 plastic surgery specimens (61.4%), the clinical diagnosis correlated with the pathological diagnosis. Statistical comparison of the overall correct diagnosis ratio between the two clinics did not show a significant difference ( p > 0.05). Patient spectrums of the two clinics were different. Benign and malignant neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the plastic surgery clinic. Inflammatory and infectious and benign neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the dermatology clinic. Biopsy methods preferred were also different, but accuracy in clinical diagnosis was comparable. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/diagnostic-accuracy-of-biopsied-skin-lesions-in-dermatology-and-7meVPjqlSr
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Springer-Verlag
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00238-007-0108-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Considering the increasing frequency of malignant skin lesions in the last decades, appropriate diagnosis of all kinds of skin lesions has become more important than ever. This study compares the type of skin lesions, seen and treated by dermatology and plastic surgery clinics in Marmara University Hospital, the preferred method of diagnosis, and the correlation between the clinical and pathological diagnosis for each clinic. Patient records, for the years 2000 and 2001, were reviewed retrospectively from the archives of the pathology department. Specimens, 495, from the dermatology clinic and 285 specimens from the plastic surgery clinic were reviewed. In the plastic surgery clinic, excisional biopsy was by far the most utilized method (93.7%). In the dermatology clinic, punch biopsy was the most frequently used method (47.9%). In 317 of the 495 dermatology specimens (64%) and in 175 of the 285 plastic surgery specimens (61.4%), the clinical diagnosis correlated with the pathological diagnosis. Statistical comparison of the overall correct diagnosis ratio between the two clinics did not show a significant difference ( p > 0.05). Patient spectrums of the two clinics were different. Benign and malignant neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the plastic surgery clinic. Inflammatory and infectious and benign neoplastic proliferations were predominant in the patient spectrum of the dermatology clinic. Biopsy methods preferred were also different, but accuracy in clinical diagnosis was comparable.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Apr 1, 2007

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off