Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Suzuki (2000)
Virus Taxonomy : Seventh Report of the International Committee for the Taxonomy of Viruses.(共著)
C. Pringle (2014)
The universal system of virus taxonomy of the International Committee on Virus Taxonomy (ICTV), including new proposals ratified since publication of the Sixth ICTV Report in 1995Archives of Virology, 143
Craig Pringle (1998)
Virus Taxonomy – San Diego 1998Archives of Virology, 143
G. Martelli (1997)
Plant virus taxa: Properties and epidemiological characteristics.Journal of Plant Pathology, 79
A. Brunt, G. Foster (1999)
Virus Taxonomy. Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxomony of Viruses
M. Mayo, Marian Horzinek (1998)
A revised version of the international code of virus classification and nomenclatureArchives of Virology, 143
M. Regenmortel, D. Bishop, C. Fauquet, M. Mayo, J. Maniloff, C. Calisher (1997)
Guidelines to the demarcation of virus speciesArchives of Virology, 142
M. Mayo, C Pringle (1998)
Virus taxonomy--1997.The Journal of general virology, 79 ( Pt 4)
Virology Division News 1659 Arch Virol 144/8 (1999) Virology Division News VDN Developments in plant virus taxonomy since the publication of the 6th ICTV Report M. A. Mayo Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, U.K. 1. Introduction The publication of the 6th ICTV Report [5] marked a significant shift in the way in which plant viruses were classified. Prior to this publication, most plant viruses were placed in one of 33 “Groups”, or in a few instances, into genera in families largely characterised by viruses of vertebrate or invertebrate animals [1]. In the 1995 classification, 41 new genera were recognised, of which 19 were classified into 7 new families. An unusual feature of this classification was that 22 genera were described that were not classified in families. These were unassigned genera, sometimes referred to as “floating” [3]. This shortened classifica- tion is now recognised in the International Code of Nomenclature and Taxonomy of Viruses [3] as being an intrinsic, if idiosynchratic, feature of virus classification. There has been substantial taxonomic activity since the publication of Murphy et al. [5] that has been outlined by Pringle [6, 7] and reviewed by Martelli [2] and Mayo and Pringle [4]. There have
Archives of Virology – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.