Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F Brüchert, G Becker, T Speck (2000)
The mechanics of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst]: mechanical properties of standing trees from different thinning regimesFor Ecol Manag, 135
C Essien, KB Via, G Acquah, T Gallagher, T McDonald, LG Eckhardt (2017)
Effect of genetic sources on anatomical, morphological, and mechanical properties of 14-year-old genetically improved loblolly pine families from two sites in the southern United StatesJ For Res
C Bertoldo, R Gonçalves (2015)
Influence of measurement position, tree diameter, and bulk wood density on models that predict wave propagation velocity in logs according to the velocity in treesFor Prod J, 65
RL Dickson, B Joe, P Harris, S Holtorf, C Wilkinson (2004)
Acoustic segregation of Australian grown Pinus radiata logs for structural board productionAust For, 67
ZR Zhou, MC Zhao, Z Wang, BJ Wang, X Guan (2013)
Acoustic testing and sorting of Chinese poplar logs for structural LVL productsBioResources, 8
Y Yin, H Nagao, X Liu, T Nakai (2010)
Mechanical properties assessment of Cunninghamia Lanceolate plantation wood with three acoustic-based nondestructive methodsJ Wood Sci, 56
J Bodig, BA Jayne (1982)
Mechanics of wood and wood composites
B Lachenbruch, GR Johnson, GM Downes, R Evans (2010)
Relationship of density, microfibril angle and sound velocity with stiffness and strength in matured of Douglas firCan J For Res, 40
A Clark, RF Daniels, L Jordan (2006)
Juvenile/mature wood transition in loblolly pine as defined by annual ring specific gravity, proportion of latewood, and microfibril angleWood Fiber Sci, 38
MJ Chan, CJ Walker, CA Raymond (2011)
Effect of moisture content and 508 temperature on acoustic velocity and dynamic MOE of radiata pine sapwood 509 boardsWood Sci Technol, 45
C Essien, KB Via, T Gallagher, T McDonald, LG Eckhardt (2017)
Sensitivity of acoustic tools to variation in equilibrium moisture content of small clear samples of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)J Indian Acad Wood Sci
C Essien, Q Cheng, BK Via, EF Loewenstein, X Wang (2016)
An acoustic operations study for loblolly pine standing saw timber with different thinning historyBioResources, 11
C Essien, BK Via, T Gallagher, T McDonald, X Wang, LG Eckhardt (2017)
Multivariate modeling of acousto-mechanical response of fourteen year old suppressed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) to variation in wood chemistry, microfibril angle, and densityWood Sci Technol, 51
X Wang, RJ Ross, P Carter (2007)
Acoustic evaluation of wood quality I standing tree. Part 1: acoustic behavior in standing treeWood Fiber Sci, 39
S McKeand, T Mullin, T Byram, T White (2003)
Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pine in the SouthJ For, 101
MA Meyers (1994)
Dynamic behavior of materials
BK Via, CL So, TF Shupe, LH Groom, J Wikaira (2009)
Mechanical response of longleaf pine to variation in microfibril angle, chemistry associated wavelengths, density and radial positionCompos A, 40
D Auty, A Achim (2008)
The relationship between standing tree acoustic assessment and timber quality in Scots pine and the practical implications for assessing timber quality from naturally regenerated standsForestry, 81
C Essien, KB Via, T Gallagher, T McDonald, LG Eckhardt (2018)
Distance error for determining the acoustic velocity of standing tree using tree morphological, physical and anatomical propertiesJ Indian Acad Wood Sci
V Vikram, ML Cherry, D Briggs, DW Cress, R Evans, GT Howe (2011)
Stiffness of Douglas-fir lumber: effect of wood properties and geneticsCan J For Res, 41
X Wang (2013)
Acoustic measurement on trees and logs: a review and analysisWood Sci Technol, 47
J Ilic (2001)
Relationship among the dynamic and static elastic properties of air-dry Eucalyptus delegatensis R. BakerHolz Roh Werkst, 59
CR Mora, LR Schimleck, F Isik, JM Mahon, A Clark, RF Daniels (2009)
Relationship between acoustic variable and different measures of stiffness in standing Pinus taeda treesCan J For Res, 39
JP Lasserre, EG Mason, MS Watt (2007)
Assessing corewood acoustic velocity and modulus of elasticity with two impact based instruments in 11-year-old trees from a clonal-spacing experiment of Pinus radiata D. DonFor Ecol Manag, 239
X Wang, RJ Ross, M McClellan, RJ Barbour, JR Erickson, JW Forsman, GD McGinnis (2001)
Nondestructive evaluation of standing tree with a stress wave methodWood Fiber Sci, 33
GF Peter, DM Benton, K Bennett (2003)
A simple direct method for measurement of microfibril angle in single fibers using differential interference contrast microscopyJ Pulp Paper Sci, 29
F Antony, LR Schimleck, L Jordan, RF Daniels, A Clark (2012)
Modeling the effect of initial planting density on within tree variation of stiffness in loblolly pineAnn For Sci, 69
X Wang, RJ Ross, BK Brashaw, J Punches, JR Erickson, JW Forsman, RE Pellerin (2004)
Diameter effect on the stress-wave evaluation of modulus of elasticity of logsWood Fiber Sci, 36
CA Raymond, B Joe, DW Anderson, DJ Watt (2008)
Effect of thinning on relationships between three measures of wood stiffness in Pinus radiata: Standing trees vs. short clear specimensCan J For Res, 38
R Wolfe (2000)
Research challenges for structural use of small-diameter round timbersFor Prod J, 50
Resonance based acoustic tools for evaluating wood properties have been reported to be more accurate in estimating the expected log MOE than time-of-flight (ToF) ones. However, there is no published study on the variations within different brands on these two major classes of acoustic tools. In this study, models were developed to predict the whole tree static MOE (WMOET) and rupture (WMORT) using log dynamic MOEs estimated by two resonance tools [Director HM200 (EHM200) and FAKOPP resonance log grader (ERLG)], ToF [FAKOPP Microsecond Timer (EFMT)], and density (green density, air-dry density) for a 14-year-old loblolly pine stand from two sites in the southern USA. The log velocity estimated by ToF was 33 and 30% more as compared to the resonance-based tools (Director HM200 and FAKOPP RLG respectively); translating into whole log static MOE (WMOEL) been 11 and 20% lower than those estimated by the resonance (HM200 and RLG respectively), and 90% lower than that estimated by the ToF tools (EFMT). Although the dynamic MOE estimated by ToF tool (EFMT) was higher, its WMOET predictive performance (R2 = 51%) lies between the 39 and 74% for the resonance based tools (HM200 and RGL respectively). This result supports the theory that ToF tools generate dilatational wave, and hence their velocity will be generally higher than resonance tools. The presence of predictive variation within the resonance suggests the need for within tools calibration. The linear relationship between the WMOET vs Etree was stronger than that of WMOET vs EHM200 suggesting that the ToF acoustic tool measurements are not restricted to the outer wood zone for small diameter logs.
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 5, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.