Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Smith-Lovin (1987)
Impressions from eventsJournal of Mathematical Sociology, 13
P. Rossi, S. Nock (1983)
Measuring social judgments : the factorial survey approachSocial Forces, 12
G. Jasso (2006)
Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and JudgmentsSociological Methods & Research, 34
(2004)
Impression formation andword combination in sentences
F. Heider (1958)
The psychology of interpersonal relations
D. Heise (1969)
Some methodological issues in semantic differential research.Psychological Bulletin, 72
B. Efron, Trevor Hastie, Iain Johnstone, R. Tibshirani (2004)
Least angle regressionAnnals of Statistics, 32
H. Gollob, B. Rossman (1973)
Judgments of an actor's Power and ability to influence othersJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9
M. Eberhart (2016)
Symbolic Interactionism As Affect Control
T. Schröder (2011)
A Model of Language-Based Impression Formation and Attribution Among GermansJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 30
David Heise (2013)
Modeling Interactions in Small GroupsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 76
Lisa Wallander (2009)
25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A reviewSocial Science Research, 38
DT Robinson, L Smith-Lovin (2006)
Contemporary Social Psychological Theories
R. James, A. Josephson (1992)
Of Human Bonding—Parent-Child Relations across the Life Course
H. Smith, T. Matsuno, Michio Umino (1994)
How Similar Are Impression-Formation Processes Among Japanese and Americans?Social Psychology Quarterly, 57
C. Osgood, William May, M. Miron (1975)
Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning
(1987)
The factorial survey approach: an introduction
(1985)
Department of Sociology and Anthropology
David Heise (2006)
Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions
J. Hoey, T. Schröder, Areej Alhothali (2013)
Bayesian Affect Control Theory2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction
(2013)
Affective Dynamics and Role Analysis (Report for SSHRC Project 410-81-0089)
J. Gray, R. Cook, S. Weisberg (1999)
Applied Regression Including Computing and GraphicsTechnometrics, 42
A. Romney, S. Weller, W. Batchelder (1986)
Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant AccuracyAmerican Anthropologist, 88
(2006)
When does consensus indicate cultural knowledge ?
(2006)
Theories, pp. 137–164
David Heise (2010)
Surveying Cultures: Discovering Shared Conceptions and Sentiments
Dawn Robinson, L. Smith-Lovin, Allison Wisecup (2006)
Affect Control Theory
A. Romney, W. Batchelder, SUSAN Weller (1987)
Recent Applications of Cultural Consensus TheoryAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 31
(1985)
Dictionary of American Regional English: Introduction and A-C
This study focused on how an action determines impressions of the individuals participating in the action, a substantive area with problematic data in the form of constricted variances, multicollinearity, and excessive influence of a few extreme cases. Stepwise regression often is used to determine which variables influence an outcome, but can lead to mis-specifications with problematic data. Thus this study compared two methods of discovering determinants of impression formation: stepwise regressions and analyses of variance (ANOVA). About three-quarters of the specifications obtained with one method also were obtained with the other method. The shared specifications especially related to stability of impressions, the effect of behavior morality, and consistency between evaluation of behaviors and evaluations of the participants in the action. Unique specifications from ANOVA were easier to interpret than those from stepwise regressions because stepwise regressions brought in more complex interactions than did ANOVA. With both methods, results from sub-samples constituted approximate subsets of results from larger samples, indicating that key effects can be found in small studies. However, compared with ANOVA, stepwise regressions with sub-samples brought in more effects that were absent in results from the full sample. The advantages of ANOVA derived from dichotomizing exogenous variables, which ameliorated data problems.
Quality & Quantity – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 9, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.