Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
FA Seima (2008)
Struktura naseleniya murav’ev taigi
V Antonova, L Penev (2006)
Change in the zoogeographical structure of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) caused by urban pressure in the Sofia region (Bulgaria)Myrmecol. Nachr., 8
ZhI Reznikova (1983)
Mezhvidovye otnosheniya murav’ev
T Yamaguchi (2004)
Influence of urbanization on ant distribution in parks of Tokyo and Chiba City, Japan: 1. Analysis of ant species richnessEcol. Res., 19
R Beckers, S Goss, JL Deneubourg, JM Pasteels (1989)
Colony size, communication, and ant foraging strategyPsyche, 96
M Kaspari, JD Majer (2000)
Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity
SP Ivanov, SV Stukalyuk (2003)
Fal’tsfeinivs’ki chitannya
P Slipinski, M Zmihorski, W Czechowski (2012)
Species diversity and nestedness of ant assemblages in an urban environmentEur. J. Entomol., 109
K Vepsäläinen, H Ikonen, M Koivula (2008)
The structure of ant assemblages in an urban area of Helsinki, southern FinlandAnn. Zool. Fenn., 45
KM Clarke, BL Fisher, G Buhn (2008)
The influence of urban park characteristics on ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) communitiesUrban Ecosyst, 11
SV Stukalyuk, VG Radchenko (2010)
The structure of multispecific associations of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Crimean MountainsEntomol. Obozr., 89
AA Zakharov, AD Sablin-Yavorskii (1998)
Murav’i v izuchenii biologicheskogo raznoobraziyaUsp. Sovrem. Biol., 118
GM Dlusskii (1981)
Murav’i pustyn’
AA Zakharov (1991)
Organizatsiya soobshchestv u murav’ev
General patterns of transformations in multispecies associations of ants in urbanized areas are revealed. The most vulnerable species in the assocation is the species that occupies the second rank in the hierarchy. As the association of the same type degrades, the subdominant species gradually disappears and then re-appears in the community. A monodominant association dominated either by a territorial species or by a weakly territorial species degrades towards a simplified community that consists of one species of a rather high rank in the hierarchy (a weakly territorial dominant or subdominant) and one or two influent species. Bidominant associations without subdominant species are derivates of partly degraded monodominant associations with a weakly territorial dominant species.
Russian Journal of Ecology – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 22, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.