Defining Subgroups of Adolescents at Risk for Experimental and Regular Smoking

Defining Subgroups of Adolescents at Risk for Experimental and Regular Smoking If multiple etiologies of substance use are truly at work in the population, then further strides in the accurate prediction of smoking and the use of other substances will likely be built on diverse pattern-centered approaches that explore the presence of multiple population subgroups across various substance use stages. The present study aimed to identify population subgroups defined by individual risk factors or risk factor constellations that prospectively predict specific smoking stages. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), analyses were conducted on the sample that took part in the baseline and 1 year follow-up assessment between 1994 and 1996. Classification and regression tree procedures were used to investigate the structure of individual risk factors, or constellations of risk, that define population subgroups with high rates of both experimental and established smoking. For each level of smoking, a relatively simple model including two subgroups predicted over half of the smoking cases. Findings also indicated that the two group models identified higher rates of regular smokers compared to experimental smokers. Deviant behaviors and alcohol use without permission independently predicted movement to experimentation at follow-up. Progression to regular smoking from both a nonsmoking and experimental smoking status at baseline were each predicted by smoking friends. Additionally, baseline levels of experimental use predicted movement from experimental to regular smoking, while a relatively low grade point average predicted rapid progression from baseline nonuse to regular use at follow-up. By identifying first approximations of patterns, these analyses may lead to clues regarding the major multiple mechanisms at work for the progression of smoking among adolescents. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Prevention Science Springer Journals

Defining Subgroups of Adolescents at Risk for Experimental and Regular Smoking

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/defining-subgroups-of-adolescents-at-risk-for-experimental-and-regular-R00kPRgTuG
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Society for Prevention Research
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Public Health; Health Psychology; Child and School Psychology
ISSN
1389-4986
eISSN
1573-6695
D.O.I.
10.1023/B:PREV.0000037640.66607.6b
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

If multiple etiologies of substance use are truly at work in the population, then further strides in the accurate prediction of smoking and the use of other substances will likely be built on diverse pattern-centered approaches that explore the presence of multiple population subgroups across various substance use stages. The present study aimed to identify population subgroups defined by individual risk factors or risk factor constellations that prospectively predict specific smoking stages. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), analyses were conducted on the sample that took part in the baseline and 1 year follow-up assessment between 1994 and 1996. Classification and regression tree procedures were used to investigate the structure of individual risk factors, or constellations of risk, that define population subgroups with high rates of both experimental and established smoking. For each level of smoking, a relatively simple model including two subgroups predicted over half of the smoking cases. Findings also indicated that the two group models identified higher rates of regular smokers compared to experimental smokers. Deviant behaviors and alcohol use without permission independently predicted movement to experimentation at follow-up. Progression to regular smoking from both a nonsmoking and experimental smoking status at baseline were each predicted by smoking friends. Additionally, baseline levels of experimental use predicted movement from experimental to regular smoking, while a relatively low grade point average predicted rapid progression from baseline nonuse to regular use at follow-up. By identifying first approximations of patterns, these analyses may lead to clues regarding the major multiple mechanisms at work for the progression of smoking among adolescents.

Journal

Prevention ScienceSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 10, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off