Objectives This study examines sentencing patterns for environmental crimes and tests the assumption that ‘‘green’’ offenders receive more lenient treatment from criminal courts than non-environmental offenders. Methods We present two sets of analyses. First, we present an empirical portrait of environmental felony offenses convicted in a single state (Florida) over a ﬁfteen-year period and the resulting criminal sanctions. Second, we use a precision matching analysis to assess whether environmental offenders receive more lenient treatment when compared to non-environmental offenders with the same characteristics and offense severity scores. Results Findings indicate that an overall small percentage of felony convictions in state courts stem from environmental crimes. We also ﬁnd that punishments for environmental crimes are more lenient than sanctions assigned to comparable non-environmental offenses when the environmental crime is ecological, but that punishments are sometimes harsher when the environmental crime involves animals. Conclusions The ﬁndings provide general support for the argument that courts and other formal institutions of social control treat environmental crimes more leniently than non- environmental crimes. This paper also raises important questions about citizen and state actors’ perceptions of crimes against the environment and, more generally, about the ways & Joshua C. Cochran firstname.lastname@example.org Elisa L. Toman
Journal of Quantitative Criminology – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 15, 2016
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud