Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue

Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue Eur J Appl Physiol (2017) 117:1845–1857 DOI 10.1007/s00421-017-3678-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue 1,2 3 3 1 José Mira  · Thomas Lapole  · Robin Souron  · Laurent Messonnier  · 2 1 Guillaume Y. Millet  · Thomas Rupp   Received: 3 February 2017 / Accepted: 30 June 2017 / Published online: 7 July 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract VA change was greater in CONTI than in TRADI TMS Purpose Currently, cortical voluntary activation (VA ) (−29 (15)% [−42, −17] vs. −9 (4)% [−13, −5], respec- TMS is assessed by superimposing transcranial magnetic stimu- tively, P < 0.001). Differences were also observed between lation (TMS) on a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), TRADI and CONTI for MEP and CSP immediately after 75% MVC and 50% MVC, each contraction being inter- the fatiguing exercise. All differences between the two spersed with 5–10  s of relaxation. Here, we assessed methods disappeared after 2 min of recovery. whether this traditional approach (TRADI) underestimates Conclusion After a 2-min sustained MVC, a few seconds central fatigue due to this short recovery compared to a of recovery change the amount of measured VA and TMS continuous method (CONTI). associated parameters of central fatigue. The continuous Methods VA , motor-evoked potential (MEP), http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Applied Physiology Springer Journals

Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/cortical-voluntary-activation-testing-methodology-impacts-central-X4x1uPGdd9
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Biomedicine; Human Physiology; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Sports Medicine
ISSN
1439-6319
eISSN
1439-6327
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00421-017-3678-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Appl Physiol (2017) 117:1845–1857 DOI 10.1007/s00421-017-3678-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue 1,2 3 3 1 José Mira  · Thomas Lapole  · Robin Souron  · Laurent Messonnier  · 2 1 Guillaume Y. Millet  · Thomas Rupp   Received: 3 February 2017 / Accepted: 30 June 2017 / Published online: 7 July 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract VA change was greater in CONTI than in TRADI TMS Purpose Currently, cortical voluntary activation (VA ) (−29 (15)% [−42, −17] vs. −9 (4)% [−13, −5], respec- TMS is assessed by superimposing transcranial magnetic stimu- tively, P < 0.001). Differences were also observed between lation (TMS) on a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), TRADI and CONTI for MEP and CSP immediately after 75% MVC and 50% MVC, each contraction being inter- the fatiguing exercise. All differences between the two spersed with 5–10  s of relaxation. Here, we assessed methods disappeared after 2 min of recovery. whether this traditional approach (TRADI) underestimates Conclusion After a 2-min sustained MVC, a few seconds central fatigue due to this short recovery compared to a of recovery change the amount of measured VA and TMS continuous method (CONTI). associated parameters of central fatigue. The continuous Methods VA , motor-evoked potential (MEP),

Journal

European Journal of Applied PhysiologySpringer Journals

Published: Jul 7, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off