Corrections to mechanical CPT results for use in liquefaction evaluation

Corrections to mechanical CPT results for use in liquefaction evaluation The cone penetration test is often used in geological and geotechnical surveys for characterising soil layers and to solve a wide set of geotechnical problems, especially for large scale studies that need to cover as wide an area as possible with more cost and time savings. For more than 30 years, there has been considerable interest in using CPT also to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of soils. The CPT-based simplified methods used for liquefaction resistance evaluation require in situ measurements from electrical cone penetrometers even if they are frequently applied using measurements from mechanical CPTs that are still preferred by current engineering practice in many countries. In the present paper, a dataset of more than 3900 pairs of measurements of cone tip resistance and sleeve friction pertaining the same soil levels and measured with the two different types of cone penetration equipment (mechanical and electrical) were obtained from 44 sites located in Northern and Central Italy. Statistical analyses and regression processes allowed for the definition of some correction equations to be included in some of the most used CPT-based methods for liquefaction resistance estimation from CPT mechanical data. A probabilistic approach based on Taylor’s method was proposed for determining the uncertainties. Finally, the reliability of the suggested correction procedure was tested on the dataset available for this study. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Springer Journals

Corrections to mechanical CPT results for use in liquefaction evaluation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/corrections-to-mechanical-cpt-results-for-use-in-liquefaction-bOaBu0RkXN
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Earth Sciences; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology; Civil Engineering; Geophysics/Geodesy; Hydrogeology; Structural Geology
ISSN
1570-761X
eISSN
1573-1456
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10518-017-0093-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The cone penetration test is often used in geological and geotechnical surveys for characterising soil layers and to solve a wide set of geotechnical problems, especially for large scale studies that need to cover as wide an area as possible with more cost and time savings. For more than 30 years, there has been considerable interest in using CPT also to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of soils. The CPT-based simplified methods used for liquefaction resistance evaluation require in situ measurements from electrical cone penetrometers even if they are frequently applied using measurements from mechanical CPTs that are still preferred by current engineering practice in many countries. In the present paper, a dataset of more than 3900 pairs of measurements of cone tip resistance and sleeve friction pertaining the same soil levels and measured with the two different types of cone penetration equipment (mechanical and electrical) were obtained from 44 sites located in Northern and Central Italy. Statistical analyses and regression processes allowed for the definition of some correction equations to be included in some of the most used CPT-based methods for liquefaction resistance estimation from CPT mechanical data. A probabilistic approach based on Taylor’s method was proposed for determining the uncertainties. Finally, the reliability of the suggested correction procedure was tested on the dataset available for this study.

Journal

Bulletin of Earthquake EngineeringSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 23, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off