Correction to: Factors affecting the cost of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) schemes

Correction to: Factors affecting the cost of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) schemes Sustainable Water Resources Management (2018) 4:191 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0243-7 CORREC TION Correction to: Factors affecting the cost of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) schemes 1 1 Andrew Ross  · Sunail Hasnain Published online: 5 June 2018 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Correction to: Sustainable Water Resources Management Capital cost/ O&M cost/m Levelised 3 3 https ://doi.org/10.1007/s4089 9-017-0210-8 m recharged recharged cost (US$/m recharged) The original version of this article unfortunately contained Recharge wells/ $ 8.07 $ 0.53 $ 1.16 mistakes. recycled water (four schemes) One MAR scheme, 12-SAT-AS, should be classified as Infiltration basins/ $ 11.41 $ 0.84 $ 1.89 using infiltration basins rather than recharge wells. This recycled water revised classification requires the following corrections: (three schemes) Table 1 Column 4 Reclassify Scheme 12 SAT-AU-AUS as infiltration/spreading basins. Page 8 Overview of costs of MAR schemes by MAR type. In paragraph 2 delete the sentences 1–3 and replace by “The data presented in Table 6 show that schemes using natural water have much lower costs than schemes using recycled water, and infiltration/spreading basins using natural water have the lowest recharge costs”. Page 8 Infiltration and spreading basins (source recycled water). Revise sentence 3 to read “In this study, this is the category with the highest average unit costs for recharging water, related to the cost of land, level of treatment or con- servative assumptions about the need to periodically reform basins. Delete sentence 4 “Operating costs are lower… with recycled water”. Table 6 Results in the first two rows of the table should read as follows: The original article can be found online at https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s4089 9-017-0210-8. * Andrew Ross a.ross@anu.edu.au Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Sustainable Water Resources Management Springer Journals

Correction to: Factors affecting the cost of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) schemes

Free
1 page
Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/springer_journal/correction-to-factors-affecting-the-cost-of-managed-aquifer-recharge-8qmo5dQfFP
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Earth Sciences; Hydrogeology; Hydrology/Water Resources; Sustainable Development; Water Policy/Water Governance/Water Management; Development Economics
ISSN
2363-5037
eISSN
2363-5045
D.O.I.
10.1007/s40899-018-0243-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Sustainable Water Resources Management (2018) 4:191 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0243-7 CORREC TION Correction to: Factors affecting the cost of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) schemes 1 1 Andrew Ross  · Sunail Hasnain Published online: 5 June 2018 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Correction to: Sustainable Water Resources Management Capital cost/ O&M cost/m Levelised 3 3 https ://doi.org/10.1007/s4089 9-017-0210-8 m recharged recharged cost (US$/m recharged) The original version of this article unfortunately contained Recharge wells/ $ 8.07 $ 0.53 $ 1.16 mistakes. recycled water (four schemes) One MAR scheme, 12-SAT-AS, should be classified as Infiltration basins/ $ 11.41 $ 0.84 $ 1.89 using infiltration basins rather than recharge wells. This recycled water revised classification requires the following corrections: (three schemes) Table 1 Column 4 Reclassify Scheme 12 SAT-AU-AUS as infiltration/spreading basins. Page 8 Overview of costs of MAR schemes by MAR type. In paragraph 2 delete the sentences 1–3 and replace by “The data presented in Table 6 show that schemes using natural water have much lower costs than schemes using recycled water, and infiltration/spreading basins using natural water have the lowest recharge costs”. Page 8 Infiltration and spreading basins (source recycled water). Revise sentence 3 to read “In this study, this is the category with the highest average unit costs for recharging water, related to the cost of land, level of treatment or con- servative assumptions about the need to periodically reform basins. Delete sentence 4 “Operating costs are lower… with recycled water”. Table 6 Results in the first two rows of the table should read as follows: The original article can be found online at https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s4089 9-017-0210-8. * Andrew Ross a.ross@anu.edu.au Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3

Journal

Sustainable Water Resources ManagementSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 5, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off