Correcting the Effects of Field of View and Varying Illumination in Spectral Measurements of Crops

Correcting the Effects of Field of View and Varying Illumination in Spectral Measurements of Crops Spectral measurements of crops offer valuable information on the state of the canopy for precision agriculture. Tractor-mounted sensors offer an effective means of providing this information because they can operate in all weathers, but any operational system must account for instrumental characteristics and for variations introduced by the weather. This study compared spectroradiometer measurements of field plots of winter-wheat made with a wide and a narrow instantaneous-field-of-view (IFOV), and with the crop canopy shaded to simulate the effect of cloud cover. Large and consistent differences in spectral reflectance were found with measurement configuration, particularly in the near-infrared: measurements made with a hemispheric IFOV were up to 60% higher on average than those with a narrow IFOV and measurements in shade were up to 40% higher than in bright sunlight. In spite of these large differences, IFOV and shading had no significant effect on the ability of vegetation indices to measure canopy density. A simple theoretical model was developed to separate the spectral dependence on leaf area from differences related to viewing and illumination angles. Fitted coefficients of the model were applied in an attempt to reconstruct the narrow IFOV sunlit spectrum from wide IFOV or shaded data. Spectra reconstructed from shade measurements were reasonably accurate, but reconstructions from wide IFOV were generally less accurate and failed drastically at low leaf area index. However, while the ability to correct for shade is essential to account for cloud cover variations during field surveys, the effect of IFOV is less critical and can be accounted for by recalibration of spectral relationships with canopy parameters. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Precision Agriculture Springer Journals

Correcting the Effects of Field of View and Varying Illumination in Spectral Measurements of Crops

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/correcting-the-effects-of-field-of-view-and-varying-illumination-in-N20LydpYbk
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Subject
Life Sciences; Agriculture; Soil Science & Conservation; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry; Statistics for Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN
1385-2256
eISSN
1573-1618
D.O.I.
10.1023/B:PRAG.0000013620.61519.86
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Spectral measurements of crops offer valuable information on the state of the canopy for precision agriculture. Tractor-mounted sensors offer an effective means of providing this information because they can operate in all weathers, but any operational system must account for instrumental characteristics and for variations introduced by the weather. This study compared spectroradiometer measurements of field plots of winter-wheat made with a wide and a narrow instantaneous-field-of-view (IFOV), and with the crop canopy shaded to simulate the effect of cloud cover. Large and consistent differences in spectral reflectance were found with measurement configuration, particularly in the near-infrared: measurements made with a hemispheric IFOV were up to 60% higher on average than those with a narrow IFOV and measurements in shade were up to 40% higher than in bright sunlight. In spite of these large differences, IFOV and shading had no significant effect on the ability of vegetation indices to measure canopy density. A simple theoretical model was developed to separate the spectral dependence on leaf area from differences related to viewing and illumination angles. Fitted coefficients of the model were applied in an attempt to reconstruct the narrow IFOV sunlit spectrum from wide IFOV or shaded data. Spectra reconstructed from shade measurements were reasonably accurate, but reconstructions from wide IFOV were generally less accurate and failed drastically at low leaf area index. However, while the ability to correct for shade is essential to account for cloud cover variations during field surveys, the effect of IFOV is less critical and can be accounted for by recalibration of spectral relationships with canopy parameters.

Journal

Precision AgricultureSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 1, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off