Computer Simulation of Joint Selection Response of MGE Patterns and a Polygenic System

Computer Simulation of Joint Selection Response of MGE Patterns and a Polygenic System Using computer simulation, selection response of three genome patterns—polygenes, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and labels of identity by origin (LIOs)—were studied. In each generation of selection, variability of each pattern type was described by an UPGMA tree. Stringent positive truncation (+) selection on an additive polygenic trait and recombination between segments of the genetic map were considered. MGEs were classified into three groups: modifiers (enhancers) of the polygenic expression, markers, and independent copies. It was shown that at generations 30 to 40, 95–96% and 70–80% of respectively enforced and non-enforced active polygenic alleles were fixed (2–3% and 16–17% lost). In all generations, H n k≤ max D n kof the length of the maximal route along the tree. At the same time, modifier MGEs were fixed for 85–88% (lost for 11–12%); marker MGEs, for 60–70% (lost for 21–25%); and independent copies, for 30–40 (lost for 50–60%). The behavior of independent MGE copies was generally consistent with the predictions of the genetic drift theory, modifier MGEs behaved similarly to the modified polygenes, and marker MGEs exhibited intermediate properties. The LIO patterns showed rapid homozygotization: their variability dropped dramatically between generations 10 and 30. In F50, the final consensus pattern of polygenes included 16 out of 18 enforced and 18 out of 21 non-enforced polygenic alleles. The fixation/loss ratios were 16 : 3 for modifier MGEs, 15 : 6 for marker MGEs, and 25 : 28 (with 7 polymorphic) for independent copies. The LIO consensus pattern contained 13 out of 100 original markers, which formed 26 fragments of one to ten map segments in size; 21 fragments contained active polygenic alleles, and 14 of them had also modifier MGEs. Recombinational shuffling of patterns was not completed. In the course of selection, active polygenic alleles take along adjacent segments, including those containing modifier MGEs and markers. These constitute the conservative part of all consensus patterns while the remaining segments are random. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Russian Journal of Genetics Springer Journals

Computer Simulation of Joint Selection Response of MGE Patterns and a Polygenic System

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/computer-simulation-of-joint-selection-response-of-mge-patterns-and-a-VIiaupUQA0
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica”
Subject
Biomedicine; Human Genetics
ISSN
1022-7954
eISSN
1608-3369
D.O.I.
10.1023/A:1012316908178
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Using computer simulation, selection response of three genome patterns—polygenes, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and labels of identity by origin (LIOs)—were studied. In each generation of selection, variability of each pattern type was described by an UPGMA tree. Stringent positive truncation (+) selection on an additive polygenic trait and recombination between segments of the genetic map were considered. MGEs were classified into three groups: modifiers (enhancers) of the polygenic expression, markers, and independent copies. It was shown that at generations 30 to 40, 95–96% and 70–80% of respectively enforced and non-enforced active polygenic alleles were fixed (2–3% and 16–17% lost). In all generations, H n k≤ max D n kof the length of the maximal route along the tree. At the same time, modifier MGEs were fixed for 85–88% (lost for 11–12%); marker MGEs, for 60–70% (lost for 21–25%); and independent copies, for 30–40 (lost for 50–60%). The behavior of independent MGE copies was generally consistent with the predictions of the genetic drift theory, modifier MGEs behaved similarly to the modified polygenes, and marker MGEs exhibited intermediate properties. The LIO patterns showed rapid homozygotization: their variability dropped dramatically between generations 10 and 30. In F50, the final consensus pattern of polygenes included 16 out of 18 enforced and 18 out of 21 non-enforced polygenic alleles. The fixation/loss ratios were 16 : 3 for modifier MGEs, 15 : 6 for marker MGEs, and 25 : 28 (with 7 polymorphic) for independent copies. The LIO consensus pattern contained 13 out of 100 original markers, which formed 26 fragments of one to ten map segments in size; 21 fragments contained active polygenic alleles, and 14 of them had also modifier MGEs. Recombinational shuffling of patterns was not completed. In the course of selection, active polygenic alleles take along adjacent segments, including those containing modifier MGEs and markers. These constitute the conservative part of all consensus patterns while the remaining segments are random.

Journal

Russian Journal of GeneticsSpringer Journals

Published: Oct 16, 2004

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off