Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses

Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal... Int Ophthalmol (2018) 38:1011–1019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses Ozge Gu¨ngo¨r Akkus¸ Ikbal Seza Petric¸li Received: 27 September 2016 / Accepted: 10 May 2017 / Published online: 18 May 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 Abstract difference were found in reading acuity, critical print Purpose To compare the visual acuity outcomes, size and maximum reading speed between two groups contrast sensitivity function (CS) and reading ability (p = .57, p = .62, p = .22). in patients with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses Conclusions This study concludes that multifocal and patients with bilateral monofocal lenses. lenses are reliable and efficient replacements for Setting Vizyon Eye Center, Denizli, Turkey. reading glasses since they significantly improve the Design Comparative case series. vision for near or intermediate distance activities. Methods Consecutive bilateral cataract patients hav- ing implantation of Acriva Reviol MFM 611 multifo- Keywords Contrast sensitivity  Visual acuity cal IOLs (Group A) or Acriva BB UD 613 monofocal Accommodation  Lens IOLs (Group B) were included. Parameters analyzed 6 months postoperatively included monocular uncor- rected distance (UDVA), binocular uncorrected inter- Introduction mediate (UIVA), binocular uncorrected http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Ophthalmology Springer Journals

Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-of-visual-outcomes-and-reading-performance-after-bilateral-oYd4qJJiuf
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Ophthalmology
ISSN
0165-5701
eISSN
1573-2630
D.O.I.
10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Int Ophthalmol (2018) 38:1011–1019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses Ozge Gu¨ngo¨r Akkus¸ Ikbal Seza Petric¸li Received: 27 September 2016 / Accepted: 10 May 2017 / Published online: 18 May 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 Abstract difference were found in reading acuity, critical print Purpose To compare the visual acuity outcomes, size and maximum reading speed between two groups contrast sensitivity function (CS) and reading ability (p = .57, p = .62, p = .22). in patients with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses Conclusions This study concludes that multifocal and patients with bilateral monofocal lenses. lenses are reliable and efficient replacements for Setting Vizyon Eye Center, Denizli, Turkey. reading glasses since they significantly improve the Design Comparative case series. vision for near or intermediate distance activities. Methods Consecutive bilateral cataract patients hav- ing implantation of Acriva Reviol MFM 611 multifo- Keywords Contrast sensitivity  Visual acuity cal IOLs (Group A) or Acriva BB UD 613 monofocal Accommodation  Lens IOLs (Group B) were included. Parameters analyzed 6 months postoperatively included monocular uncor- rected distance (UDVA), binocular uncorrected inter- Introduction mediate (UIVA), binocular uncorrected

Journal

International OphthalmologySpringer Journals

Published: May 18, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off