Comparison of the outcome of suprafacial and subfacial dissection of radial forearm in head and neck reconstruction

Comparison of the outcome of suprafacial and subfacial dissection of radial forearm in head and... Purpose Radial forearm flap is a versatile and reliable tool in oral cancer reconstruction. However, a spectrum of donor-site deficits following harvest of this flap has been reported. Several surgical technique has been proposed to improve skin graft take and tendon exposure and subsequent undesirable results at donor site. Objective The study was conducted to compare the donor-site morbidity associated with suprafacial radial forearm flap to that with subfacial donor site in oral cancer reconstructive surgery at our unit. Methodology A total of 20 patients were included in the study and were categorized into suprafacial group and subfacial group. The donor-site morbidity was assessed both objectively and subjectively at 15 days, 1 month and 4 months postop- eratively. The subjective evaluation was done using patient-related wrist elevation and patient and observer scar assessment. Results The suprafacial showed 80% of patients with complete graft uptake when compared to 50% in subfacial group and 20% showed delayed healing in subfacial group. Range of motion and grip strength was found higher in suprafacial group. Subjective evaluation revealed a better aesthetic out come in suprafacial group. The subjective evaluation for pain and func- tion did not reveal a statistically significant difference between two groups. Conclusion The http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Oral Cancer Springer Journals

Comparison of the outcome of suprafacial and subfacial dissection of radial forearm in head and neck reconstruction

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-of-the-outcome-of-suprafacial-and-subfacial-dissection-of-TS9zAG0zst
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Dentistry; Dentistry; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Oncology
eISSN
2509-8837
D.O.I.
10.1007/s41548-018-0006-z
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose Radial forearm flap is a versatile and reliable tool in oral cancer reconstruction. However, a spectrum of donor-site deficits following harvest of this flap has been reported. Several surgical technique has been proposed to improve skin graft take and tendon exposure and subsequent undesirable results at donor site. Objective The study was conducted to compare the donor-site morbidity associated with suprafacial radial forearm flap to that with subfacial donor site in oral cancer reconstructive surgery at our unit. Methodology A total of 20 patients were included in the study and were categorized into suprafacial group and subfacial group. The donor-site morbidity was assessed both objectively and subjectively at 15 days, 1 month and 4 months postop- eratively. The subjective evaluation was done using patient-related wrist elevation and patient and observer scar assessment. Results The suprafacial showed 80% of patients with complete graft uptake when compared to 50% in subfacial group and 20% showed delayed healing in subfacial group. Range of motion and grip strength was found higher in suprafacial group. Subjective evaluation revealed a better aesthetic out come in suprafacial group. The subjective evaluation for pain and func- tion did not reveal a statistically significant difference between two groups. Conclusion The

Journal

Oral CancerSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 12, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off