Comparison of pre- and postoperative orbital volume using three dimensional CT imaging in zygoma fracture patients

Comparison of pre- and postoperative orbital volume using three dimensional CT imaging in zygoma... The aims of this study were (1) to assess the difference between the volume of the traumatized and non-traumatized orbit, (2) to determine the critical change in orbital volume that will result in enophthalmos, and (3) to analyze the correlation between volume discrepancy and clinical outcome in maxillofacial trauma patients. Twenty-seven surgically managed patients with a fracture of the orbitozygomatic complex were included in this study. Preoperative and postoperative volume measurements of both orbits were compared, using software whose accuracy was confirmed in a preliminary experimental study in dry skulls. The correlation between volume discrepancy and clinical enophthalmos was statistically assessed before and after surgery. Preoperatively, there was an increase in orbital volume in 26 of 27 cases, with a range of 0.04–6.02 cc compared with the intact orbits. The mean volume difference between the orbits was 3.01±1.64 cm3 in the preoperative period, and this decreased to 1.02±1.29 cm3 following operation (P<0.01). Five patients (19%) showed clinical enophthalmos with a mean volume difference of 4.77±0.18 cm3 preoperatively. Clinical enophthalmos persisted postoperatively in only one of five enophthalmic patients, in whom the volume discrepancy was greater than 4 cm3. Our data suggested that the technique described here is an easy and accurate method of assessing the volume of the orbit. Orbital volume measurement may help the surgeon to predict volume to be restored and to avoid probable complications. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Plastic Surgery Springer Journals

Comparison of pre- and postoperative orbital volume using three dimensional CT imaging in zygoma fracture patients

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-of-pre-and-postoperative-orbital-volume-using-three-KWiggfYFR2
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Plastic Surgery
ISSN
0930-343X
eISSN
1435-0130
D.O.I.
10.1007/s002380000201
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to assess the difference between the volume of the traumatized and non-traumatized orbit, (2) to determine the critical change in orbital volume that will result in enophthalmos, and (3) to analyze the correlation between volume discrepancy and clinical outcome in maxillofacial trauma patients. Twenty-seven surgically managed patients with a fracture of the orbitozygomatic complex were included in this study. Preoperative and postoperative volume measurements of both orbits were compared, using software whose accuracy was confirmed in a preliminary experimental study in dry skulls. The correlation between volume discrepancy and clinical enophthalmos was statistically assessed before and after surgery. Preoperatively, there was an increase in orbital volume in 26 of 27 cases, with a range of 0.04–6.02 cc compared with the intact orbits. The mean volume difference between the orbits was 3.01±1.64 cm3 in the preoperative period, and this decreased to 1.02±1.29 cm3 following operation (P<0.01). Five patients (19%) showed clinical enophthalmos with a mean volume difference of 4.77±0.18 cm3 preoperatively. Clinical enophthalmos persisted postoperatively in only one of five enophthalmic patients, in whom the volume discrepancy was greater than 4 cm3. Our data suggested that the technique described here is an easy and accurate method of assessing the volume of the orbit. Orbital volume measurement may help the surgeon to predict volume to be restored and to avoid probable complications.

Journal

European Journal of Plastic SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Dec 15, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off