Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study

Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for... International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2017) 41:1831–1837 DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x ORIGINAL PAPER Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study 1 2 2 2 Sebastian P. Boelch & Martin C. Jordan & Rainer H. Meffert & Hendrik Jansen Received: 6 December 2015 /Accepted: 25 July 2016 /Published online: 10 August 2016 SICOT aisbl 2016 Abstract operative full weight-bearing. Various techniques, affording Purpose Treating acetabular fractures with open reduction fixation of the unstable acetabular columns, are described. In and internal fixation (ORIF) may lead to poorer outcomes in THR with an anti-protrusion cage, only dorsal column insta- older patients. As data for osteoporotic acetabular fractures are bility needs to be addressed. limited, we compared primary total hip replacement (THR) Conclusion The described technique achieved sufficient ace- with ORIF for treating osteoporotic acetabular fractures, in- tabular component stability. Primary THR with an anti- cluding those with posterior column instability. protrusion cage is an advantageous option to ORIF and should Methods All patients with osteoporotic acetabular fractures, be strongly considered for osteoporotic acetabular fractures. treated with ORIF or primary THR from 2005 to 2015, were assessed retrospectively for clinical and radiologic outcomes. Keywords http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Orthopaedics Springer Journals

Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-of-open-reduction-and-internal-fixation-and-primary-total-IyGnta0oG7
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by SICOT aisbl
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics
ISSN
0341-2695
eISSN
1432-5195
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2017) 41:1831–1837 DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3260-x ORIGINAL PAPER Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study 1 2 2 2 Sebastian P. Boelch & Martin C. Jordan & Rainer H. Meffert & Hendrik Jansen Received: 6 December 2015 /Accepted: 25 July 2016 /Published online: 10 August 2016 SICOT aisbl 2016 Abstract operative full weight-bearing. Various techniques, affording Purpose Treating acetabular fractures with open reduction fixation of the unstable acetabular columns, are described. In and internal fixation (ORIF) may lead to poorer outcomes in THR with an anti-protrusion cage, only dorsal column insta- older patients. As data for osteoporotic acetabular fractures are bility needs to be addressed. limited, we compared primary total hip replacement (THR) Conclusion The described technique achieved sufficient ace- with ORIF for treating osteoporotic acetabular fractures, in- tabular component stability. Primary THR with an anti- cluding those with posterior column instability. protrusion cage is an advantageous option to ORIF and should Methods All patients with osteoporotic acetabular fractures, be strongly considered for osteoporotic acetabular fractures. treated with ORIF or primary THR from 2005 to 2015, were assessed retrospectively for clinical and radiologic outcomes. Keywords

Journal

International OrthopaedicsSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 10, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off