Comparison of logistic regressions and snowfall intensity–duration threshold as forecasting tools for direct-action snow avalanches in the Presidential Range, New Hampshire, USA

Comparison of logistic regressions and snowfall intensity–duration threshold as forecasting... Snow avalanches are an important natural hazard for backcountry skiers and alpinists in the Presidential Range (New Hampshire, United States). Over the past 20 years, over 72 people were involved in avalanche accidents. Direct-action avalanches resulting from recent snowfall dominate the avalanche regime of this region. Given this peculiarity, avalanche activity should be influenced by the intensity and duration of snowfalls. This study compares logistic regressions (LR) and a novel approach based on snowfall intensity–duration (ID) thresholds to analyse the weather patterns favourable to the triggering of snow avalanches. LR models suggest that 72-h solid precipitation, 24-h liquid precipitation, 72-h average daily maximum temperature and 72-h average winds peed are the best predictors of avalanche activity. The accuracy of the snowfall ID threshold to predict snow avalanches was similar to the accuracy of rainfall ID thresholds to identify landslide activity. However, a Monte Carlo cross-validation procedure suggests that the LR model is more accurate and more robust in predicting avalanche activity, since they allow the inclusion of more meteorological predictors. Finally, we discuss the relevance of this novel approach and the need for replicate studies in similar, direct-action avalanche-dominated contexts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Natural Hazards Springer Journals

Comparison of logistic regressions and snowfall intensity–duration threshold as forecasting tools for direct-action snow avalanches in the Presidential Range, New Hampshire, USA

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-of-logistic-regressions-and-snowfall-intensity-duration-pF0SPZ07A5
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Earth Sciences; Natural Hazards; Hydrogeology; Geophysics/Geodesy; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Civil Engineering; Environmental Management
ISSN
0921-030X
eISSN
1573-0840
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11069-018-3361-5
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Snow avalanches are an important natural hazard for backcountry skiers and alpinists in the Presidential Range (New Hampshire, United States). Over the past 20 years, over 72 people were involved in avalanche accidents. Direct-action avalanches resulting from recent snowfall dominate the avalanche regime of this region. Given this peculiarity, avalanche activity should be influenced by the intensity and duration of snowfalls. This study compares logistic regressions (LR) and a novel approach based on snowfall intensity–duration (ID) thresholds to analyse the weather patterns favourable to the triggering of snow avalanches. LR models suggest that 72-h solid precipitation, 24-h liquid precipitation, 72-h average daily maximum temperature and 72-h average winds peed are the best predictors of avalanche activity. The accuracy of the snowfall ID threshold to predict snow avalanches was similar to the accuracy of rainfall ID thresholds to identify landslide activity. However, a Monte Carlo cross-validation procedure suggests that the LR model is more accurate and more robust in predicting avalanche activity, since they allow the inclusion of more meteorological predictors. Finally, we discuss the relevance of this novel approach and the need for replicate studies in similar, direct-action avalanche-dominated contexts.

Journal

Natural HazardsSpringer Journals

Published: May 30, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off