Comparison of gesture and conventional interaction techniques for interventional neuroradiology

Comparison of gesture and conventional interaction techniques for interventional neuroradiology Int J CARS (2017) 12:1643–1653 DOI 10.1007/s11548-017-1523-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison of gesture and conventional interaction techniques for interventional neuroradiology 1 1 1 Julian Hettig · Patrick Saalfeld · Maria Luz · 2 2 1 Mathias Becker · Martin Skalej · Christian Hansen Received: 8 September 2016 / Accepted: 6 January 2017 / Published online: 24 January 2017 © CARS 2017 Abstract future work should consider task characteristics to provide a Purpose Interaction with radiological image data and vol- useful gesture interface for a specific use case instead of an ume renderings within a sterile environment is a challenging all-in-one solution. task. Clinically established methods such as joystick control and task delegation can be time-consuming and error-prone Keywords Human–computer interaction · Evaluation · and interrupt the workflow. New touchless input modalities Interventional neuroradiology · Image-guided interventions may have the potential to overcome these limitations, but their value compared to established methods is unclear. Methods We present a comparative evaluation to analyze Introduction the value of two gesture input modalities (Myo Gesture Control Armband and Leap Motion Controller) versus two Interventional radiology is an increasingly important branch clinically established methods (task delegation and joystick of radiology, enabling minimally invasive procedures to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Springer Journals

Comparison of gesture and conventional interaction techniques for interventional neuroradiology

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-of-gesture-and-conventional-interaction-techniques-for-w3SEfEFkj0
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by CARS
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Imaging / Radiology; Surgery; Health Informatics; Computer Imaging, Vision, Pattern Recognition and Graphics; Computer Science, general
ISSN
1861-6410
eISSN
1861-6429
D.O.I.
10.1007/s11548-017-1523-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Int J CARS (2017) 12:1643–1653 DOI 10.1007/s11548-017-1523-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison of gesture and conventional interaction techniques for interventional neuroradiology 1 1 1 Julian Hettig · Patrick Saalfeld · Maria Luz · 2 2 1 Mathias Becker · Martin Skalej · Christian Hansen Received: 8 September 2016 / Accepted: 6 January 2017 / Published online: 24 January 2017 © CARS 2017 Abstract future work should consider task characteristics to provide a Purpose Interaction with radiological image data and vol- useful gesture interface for a specific use case instead of an ume renderings within a sterile environment is a challenging all-in-one solution. task. Clinically established methods such as joystick control and task delegation can be time-consuming and error-prone Keywords Human–computer interaction · Evaluation · and interrupt the workflow. New touchless input modalities Interventional neuroradiology · Image-guided interventions may have the potential to overcome these limitations, but their value compared to established methods is unclear. Methods We present a comparative evaluation to analyze Introduction the value of two gesture input modalities (Myo Gesture Control Armband and Leap Motion Controller) versus two Interventional radiology is an increasingly important branch clinically established methods (task delegation and joystick of radiology, enabling minimally invasive procedures to

Journal

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Jan 24, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off