Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 402:1159–1165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1637-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy 1 1 1 1 Hiroyuki Kitagawa & Tsutomu Namikawa & Jun Iwabu & Kazune Fujisawa & 2 1 Michiya Kobayashi & Kazuhiro Hanazaki Received: 13 July 2017 /Accepted: 1 November 2017 /Published online: 7 November 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017 . . Abstract Keywords Thoracoscopic esophagectomy Prone position Purpose This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the Cervical approach Esophageal cancer prior cervical and thoracic approaches of thoracoscopic esoph- agectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Methods We reviewed the records of 103 consecutive patients Introduction who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone po- sition for esophageal cancer. Seventy-four patients underwent Esophagectomy is the main treatment for esophageal cancer; the prior cervical approach (Cervical group); the other 29 however, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy was underwent the thoracic approach (Thoracic group). The periop- associated with high incidence of postoperative complica- erative outcomes of the two groups were compared. tions, including pneumonia and anastomotic leakage [1]. To Results Total operative time and volume of blood loss were not reduce surgical stress and postoperative complications, different between the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Springer Journals

Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparison-between-neck-first-approach-and-thoracic-approach-during-i33yKYCWuJ
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; General Surgery; Abdominal Surgery; Cardiac Surgery; Thoracic Surgery; Traumatic Surgery; Vascular Surgery
ISSN
1435-2443
eISSN
1435-2451
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00423-017-1637-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Langenbecks Arch Surg (2017) 402:1159–1165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1637-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy 1 1 1 1 Hiroyuki Kitagawa & Tsutomu Namikawa & Jun Iwabu & Kazune Fujisawa & 2 1 Michiya Kobayashi & Kazuhiro Hanazaki Received: 13 July 2017 /Accepted: 1 November 2017 /Published online: 7 November 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017 . . Abstract Keywords Thoracoscopic esophagectomy Prone position Purpose This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the Cervical approach Esophageal cancer prior cervical and thoracic approaches of thoracoscopic esoph- agectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Methods We reviewed the records of 103 consecutive patients Introduction who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone po- sition for esophageal cancer. Seventy-four patients underwent Esophagectomy is the main treatment for esophageal cancer; the prior cervical approach (Cervical group); the other 29 however, esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy was underwent the thoracic approach (Thoracic group). The periop- associated with high incidence of postoperative complica- erative outcomes of the two groups were compared. tions, including pneumonia and anastomotic leakage [1]. To Results Total operative time and volume of blood loss were not reduce surgical stress and postoperative complications, different between the

Journal

Langenbeck's Archives of SurgerySpringer Journals

Published: Nov 7, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off