Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation

Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation Eur J Pediatr (2017) 176:1285–1286 DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-2977-x CORRESPONDENCE Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation 1 1 1 1 Gui-Zhen Yang & Fu-Shan Xue & Hui-Xian Li & Ya-Yang Liu Received: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 28 July 2017 /Published online: 7 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 To the Editor: is, when one option at first attempt fails, intubators can immedi- In a manikin study by Madziala et al. [1] comparing video and ately switch to another option to successfully complete intubation direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation in simulated without having to make a second attempt [4]. This unique feature immobilized cervical spine condition, all participants had no of Macintosh-type VL is significantly different from DL and angulated or channeled VLs, which can only provide an option. prior experience with any video laryngoscope (VL) and had minimal direct laryngoscope (DL) experience. However, they Thus, definition of first attempt success used in this study is received same training with two studied devices before the suitable for DL and angulated or channeled video laryngo- study. The authors ignored an important issue, namely, the scopes, but not for Macintosh-type VL. different learning curves are required for two studied devices. It has http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Pediatrics Springer Journals

Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer_journal/comparing-video-and-direct-laryngoscopes-for-pediatric-intubation-kqHvL4OEYh
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Pediatrics
ISSN
0340-6199
eISSN
1432-1076
D.O.I.
10.1007/s00431-017-2977-x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Eur J Pediatr (2017) 176:1285–1286 DOI 10.1007/s00431-017-2977-x CORRESPONDENCE Comparing video and direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation 1 1 1 1 Gui-Zhen Yang & Fu-Shan Xue & Hui-Xian Li & Ya-Yang Liu Received: 29 May 2017 /Accepted: 28 July 2017 /Published online: 7 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 To the Editor: is, when one option at first attempt fails, intubators can immedi- In a manikin study by Madziala et al. [1] comparing video and ately switch to another option to successfully complete intubation direct laryngoscopes for pediatric intubation in simulated without having to make a second attempt [4]. This unique feature immobilized cervical spine condition, all participants had no of Macintosh-type VL is significantly different from DL and angulated or channeled VLs, which can only provide an option. prior experience with any video laryngoscope (VL) and had minimal direct laryngoscope (DL) experience. However, they Thus, definition of first attempt success used in this study is received same training with two studied devices before the suitable for DL and angulated or channeled video laryngo- study. The authors ignored an important issue, namely, the scopes, but not for Macintosh-type VL. different learning curves are required for two studied devices. It has

Journal

European Journal of PediatricsSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 7, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off